Bend It Like Oscar!

Today's the first day we felt Oscar kick!  Well, Shea's been feeling it internally for a few weeks.  But today's the first time we could feel the thump on the outside.  According to Shea, the kid likes to kick like nobody's business.  (Hopefully a $250 million soccer contract is in his (or her – must be gender positive!) future.) 

Oh my god!  Now, Shea held her breath and I was able to see the baby thumping right under her skin.  Jesus, there's an alien in there!! 

LibraryThing Redux (and a glimpse into my real world book collection)

I just wrote about LibraryThing last Friday (indirectly when mentioning a new competitor it has called Shelfari.)  But that entry inspired me to revisit the site and my explorations since then have, in turn, inspired a more in-depth post about LibraryThing. 

First off, for anyone who doesn't know, LibraryThing is a Web 2.0 web site that automates the process of adding your book collection faciliates interaction with people who share similar tastes.  I think you can enter 200 or so books for free before having to buy a $10 annual membership or a $25 lifetime one.  (A percentage of the site was also bought by ABEBooks.com so it's got a fair bit of stability and shouldn't be going anywhere anytime soon.)

I'm going to go back a bit and explain a bit about how I tend to use hot new sites like this one.  Even though I consider myself fairly  “techie” in a lot of ways, I often tend to be a late adopter as well.  I'd been reading MetaFilter for years but was only inspired to join  after September 11 and I *had* to make comments on what happened that day.  I only really got into Digg last year even though I've been aware of the site for awhile. I only started a blog last year (I have a Blogger account I created in 2001 though it had a grand total of one post.  And that post is a joke about how I'm three years behind the trends by starting a blog at that time – which is pretty much the same joke I used in my very first entry when I started this blog in 2006!)  I resisted RSS for a long time but now love it. 

It's not just hot new web sites and cutting-edge Internet technologies that I sometimes am slow to come around to.  I only bought my first digital camera and my first MP3 player this year.  And I'd joined LibraryThing over a year ago (Sept 15, 2005) according to my Profile page on that site but added a couple books initially then promptly forgot about it. 

But as I said, writing about LibraryThing and its newest competitor (and having some time on my hands) inspired me to revisit the site.  Also, seeing “What I'm Reading” widgets on a few blogs I visit regularly made me want to add something similar to my site (which meant, of course, that a catalogue of just two books would never do.) 

So I've added 100 books so far – mostly my favourites but also with a bias towards ones that had cover images already associated with them since that's the only type of book that I've setup the widget to display. 

(Slight tangent: I looked up the difference between setup, set-up and set up the other day and have promptly forgotten the difference – I think one is a noun, one is a verb and one is an adverb? For the purposes of this blog, I will ignore proper grammar and use whichever one looks best at the moment I type it, similar to how I reserve the right to use both “color” and “colour” interchangeably, often within the same entry.)

I've got a lot of work to do if I want to add every book I own.  Here's a photo of the library in my office (it's usually not that messy but I still haven't unpacked a lot of the paperwork/boxes we brought back from London.  That's the curse of selling off all your bookshelves, desks, etc. but keeping all the stuff that would normally go on them!) 

In addition to the books shown, I have another bookshelf in the office that's just to the right of the camera, one upstairs (and Shea has one specifically for her cookbook collection).  And on top of that, I have another college-style bricks and 2×4's bookshelf with a similar number of books in my parent's basement.  (That phrase about real world stores being “bricks and mortar” has a definite relevance when thinking about my book collection!)


The question everyone who comes over inevitably asks if “Have you read all of those?” and the inevitable answer is: No, of course not – I read fairly fast but I'm not a speed reader by any means.  “So why do you have so many books?”

Well, I just like books.  I like how they look and the potential they have, even just sitting on a shelf.  Also, part of my problem is that I can't resist them.  I go to garage sales and used book sales and bookstores and will basically take anything that looks semi-interesting and/or is cheap. 

I was out at the local technical college the other day and they had a book sale going on.  I bought a book on cardiac nursing for Shea, a book on the government policy in the 1970's in Saskatchewan, a book on book-related careers and a slightly outdated sociology textbook that would probably cost $80+ if new.  Grand cost to me for all four books?  A loonie!

I also get a lot of free books – from working with publishers and writers, from doing book reviews.  I've belonged to book clubs.  I've been to BookExpo Canada twice and probably brought home a few dozen books from it each time.

Hmmm, can anybody make out anything embarrassing or incriminating in that photo?  I hope not!  (It's like the “Where's Waldo” of messy bookshelves – see if you can spot the Elvis biography!  Hint: top right.  And worse, there are a few of them.   In my defence, I borrowed them from my dad when I was working on a screenplay when I was participating in the Calgary Screenwriters Group.)

That actually leads nicely into my next point.  As much as I love what sites like LibraryThing (and LastFM for music and Digg for news and so on) offer in terms of being to see what other people with similar tastes are reading/listening to, the flip side is that you have to put yourself out there as well to be effective. 

I don't know if anybody pays attention to the “Recently Played” songs on the right side of this blog but I know there have been times when say, a Paris Hilton song, would pop up there after I listened to it.  Then I'd go to CLA for a week and it's be stuck there as if that was the only song I ever listened to that week.  Embarrassing but I mean, I did listen to it (and didn't even mind it that much.  It can't be Sujfan Stevens all the time, right?) 

The same with the books I've put in LibraryThing.  I debated only adding the books I wanted to “represent” me – the cool ones and the controversial ones, the literary ones and the legendary ones.  But that's not really the purpose of the site, again, especially if you want it to be as effective as it can be.  For instance, the more books you enter from your library, the more likely you are to find people with similar books in their libraries.  (The person I link to has 5 books out of the 131 they've catalogued in common with me.)

So my goal is to upload all of my books someday (if you're not a member, it's very easy.  Type in the name of the book – or author or ISBN or whatever – and the site queries the Library of Congress or Amazon or a University catalogue or another site of your choice – then presents a list.  You select your book from the list and it, along with all relevant information, is added to your profile.  If you have a laptop with wireless to take right to the bookshelf, it is an incredibly fast process.)

We learned at library school that you should never be embarrassed
abouty our reading so, as I said, I'm going to upload everything…eventually.  My
biggest secret shame is that I used to be a huge pro wrestling fan
growing up (Stampede Wrestling was inevitably a big part of your childhood if you were a boy growing up on the Prairies in the 80's.)  And I'm sure that the few wrestling books I own aren't even the most embarrassing things in my collection.  Some people look down their noses at any plebian who would own a Stephen King paperback.  I (not Shea) own at least a few Harlequin romance novels.  I own way more self-published books than is healthy for your sanity.

There's still a lot of exploring left to do.  Can you classify books as “read”, “to read”, “own”, “to own”?  That would be handy.  Tagging would probably do it, I guess.  But I'd like the option to keep that information private – maybe I don't want everything about my reading habits out there!

So anyhow, this has turned into yet another long, rambling, middle of the night entry.  But getting to the whole reason I decided to write about LibraryThing – when I was entering some books tonight and exploring the site some more, I realised they now also have social networking functions, one of which is groups.  So you can join a group of like-minded people – based on genre or occupation or whatever – and post messages to a discussion board, see what the others in the group are reading, etc. 

Here's a group called “Librarians Who LibraryThing” (and really, this could've been a single line entry consisting of those seven words if I wasn't such a windbag tonight.)  Librarians Who LibraryThing happens to also be the largest group on LibraryThing with twice as many members as its next most popular one (a group for SF fans.)  Librarians rock! 

I Want A Firefox Extension To…

One of the beautiful things about Firefox as a browser is how customizable it is.  According to my stats, the vast majority of people reading this blog use that browser so I thought I'd pass along this site that I had bookmarked: I Want A Firefox Extension To… which is a collection of over 200 extensions that add functionality to the Firefox browser in areas from Ad Blocking to Links to Weather.

I think I may have listed this elsewhere on the blog already but there are some new ones on the list since then so here is a list of extensions I have installed.  My absolute favourites are in bold italic (I'm too lazy to add links to all of them but just do a Google search on any of their names and you'll find them) :

Adblock
– blocks ads (duh)

AddBookMarkHere
– helps control where bookmarks get added in your folder structure

AlwaysRememberPassword
– just like the name says, useful for banking sites and others that tend to clear your password, even if you told the browser to remember it.

Answers
– ALT-right click on any word to get a definition and other information

Colourful Tabs
– makes your tabs different colours which helps usability way more than it sounds like it should! 

CopyURL+
– allows you to copy to the clipboard the current document's address
along with additional information such as the document's title, the
current selection or both.

CustomizeGoogle
– just like it says, provides all kinds of hacks to make Google more usable

delicious
– adds buttons to your navigation bar for quickly adding bookmarks to Delicious

DOMInspector
– provides easy access to meta information about a web page

DownThemAll
– download all links on a page.  Useful for sites that have things like multiple MP3 files or multiple programs to download.

Foxylicious
– combines your Firefox and delicious bookmarks

FoxyTunes
– provides controls for your media player within your browser

GDirections
– provides right click access directly to Google Maps when you highlight an address on a web page

GooglePreview
– provides thumbnails of web pages in your Google results

GoogleToolbar
– adds a toolbar to provide direct access to all Google functions

IETab
– allows you to switch to Internet Explorer without leaving the Firefox browser.  Useful for those sites that are still only accessible in IE.

MetaFilthy
– tracks various information about your reading habits on MetaFilter

PDFDownloader
– provides a few extra options for reading PDF files

Screengrab!
– allows you capture an entire web page as a graphic image rather than just what's displayed in the browser window as is the case with a “Print Screen” grab.

SearchEngine Ordering
– gives you control of how your search extensions are ordered

TabMixPlus
– gives you complete control over all aspects of your tabbed browsing

Unplug
– easily grab video clips from YouTube, Google Video and other video sites

Alternatives to 'R" Rated Movies For A Business Ethics Course?

A professor teaching a business ethics course assigns certain films (“Thank You For Not Smoking”, “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”, “Wall Street”) but has had a request for alternate films from a student who doesn't watch 'R' rated movies. 

The professor posts a question on AskMetafilter looking for alternate selections but in addition to giving suggestions, people respond with proposals covering a range of ideas from assigning the print-version of the scripts, assigning a paper instead of allowing the student to view alternate films,  or simply requiring the student to watch the assigned films or suffer the stated consequences (lower grade or whatever.)

There's no explanation why the student won't watch R rated films – one poster speculates that they might be religious, another speculates they're just trying to get out of work.

There are a couple good quotes in the thread defending each point of view:

“Don't most ethical violations come from seeing oneself as an exception to a rule somehow?”


vs:

If
they can make a solid case for it (and isn't that what most of
business/professional life is all about), then I'll allow them to come
up with an alternative…[plus] t
heir ability
to find a creative solution to the issue and pitch it to me
successfully was a teaching opportunity in itself.”



Unless I had more details, I'm not sure what I would do if I were the professor in this situation.  It's possibly a bit more work for the prof to come up with alternate suggestions but if they're willing to do so and can find films with themes along similar topics to the ones assigned, if it doesn't unfairly unbalance the class in terms of both workload and discussion, I don't see why something like this should be a problem. 

I had a similar situation in my “Collection Development in Academic Libraries” course – I wanted to focus on public library-related issues for my assignments and approached the professor about doing this.  After some discussion, we reached a compromise where I could do 1-2 of the five assignments on public library-related topics.  I ended up only doing one like this, (I think) it helped add a different dimension to the class when I presented it, and in retrospect, I'm glad I wasn't allowed to focus completely on public library topics because as much as I want to, there's no guarantee I'll end up working in a public library so the exposure to academic topics has been invaluable (I got a slightly panicked IM from a classmate – “tell me everything you know about collection development in academic libraries!” right before they went for a job interview.  I was able to send them the assignments I'd done for that class and hopefully it helped them out a bit.)

As for the issue at hand about respecting the sensitivities of people, I'm reminded of what a friend on the Writers Guild of Alberta mailing list wrote around the time of the Dutch “Mohammed” cartoons controversy. 

“Just because you can give offense, does it mean that you should?” 

I'm usually a “people should be able to see and do anything” and it's the other person's problem if they're offended. But this person was heavily involved in the Calgary Freedom to Read Committee and I respected them a great deal.  So that perceptive comment really stuck with me.

Here's a link to the full thread:
PG Alternatives for R-rated Business Ethics movies | Ask MetaFilter

RoryGate – Did the NHL "Fix" The All-Star Game?

The NHL All-Star Game is coming up in a couple days.  This year is the first All-Star game since 2004 (2005 was missed due to the lockout, 2006 was skipped due to the Winter Olympics) and many saw it as an opportunity for the league to continue their rebound from the bad feelings caused by the lockout, highlight some of their brightest young stars like Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin, and reach out to the fans by allowing them to vote for the starting line-up soley via an online system for the first time ever. 

To encourage fans to be involved, the NHL allowed fans to vote as many times as they wanted.  Unfortunately, one fan decided to take advantage of this rule by starting a write-in “Vote For Rory Fitzpatrick” campaign (Rory is a journeyman defenseman with the Vancouver Canucks who, as of today, has a whopping 1 goal and 2 assists this year.)  The campaign caught on with fans and the media across North America and Rory quickly vaulted up to one of the starting positions.  Part of the reason for this was some tech-savvy fans who wrote bots that thwarted the NHL's (feeble) security measures and automated the process of voting multiple times for Rory.  (An analogy might be that they saw the “take a penny/leave a penny” jar and took all fifty pennies in it to buy a chocolate bar – technically “legal” but definitely not in the spirit of the penny jar.) 

But, even with all of the fan support, both human and automated, when the final results were announced, Rory wasn't among the starters named. 

There are obviously two sides to this – people like Wayne Gretzky were on record that this campaign made the league look like a joke (even though the All-Star game is often viewed as a joke anyhow by hockey purists) while others thought “Vote For Rory” was a great media hook that would only serve to stir interest in the league. 

But now, a report in the online magazines, Slate, uncovers evidence that indicates the NHL may have purposely distorted the online voting so that Rory didn't win a spot in the starting line-up.  Reminiscient of the electronic-voting scandal during the 2000 Presidential election, this is a black mark on the NHL if true. 

It's been almost two years since a lockout
almost ruined the sport. Now the league has baited, misled, and
rejected its fans. The NHL has hit a new low. It's turned the All-Star
Game—an event that's supposed to be about giving people what they
want—into a repudiation of the game's most loyal supporters.




http://www.slate.com/id/2157741/

Hanging Out In Tommy Douglas' Basement

After Shea got off work last night, we drove down to Weyburn to visit her parents for the weekend and I had a busy day today.  I met with a local librarian (and former FIMS grad) for a long chat this morning, made mis-shapen buns this afternoon, then met with another local librarian, who is also a FIMS grad and was my professional mentor during my last semester, for drinks tonight.  (I'd specifically requested a mentor from Saskatchewan knowing I'd be coming back so that it would be nice to have somebody who was more connected to this province than the Ontario-based mentors I'd had in my first two semesters.)

Shea's uncle is fairly involved with the NDP so I had a pretty cool experience as well when he invited me to join him at the AGM for the local federal NDP constituency association in the afternoon. It was held in the basement of the original church where Tommy Douglas began his career.  Following the meeting, I was able to go up and see the church (which is now a performing arts centre) and the small Tommy Douglas museum they have in the building. 

In addition to the regular business of an AGM, the group are beginning to gear up for an election which will likely come in the next few months, possibly as soon as the summer.  They're looking for ideas for candidates, especially new blood, and I even had one old timer lean over during this discussion and ask, “So, you live in Weyburn?” 

I didn't have the heart to explain to him that by having a blog, my chances of ever getting elected to any public office are less than zero.  So I just told him the truth – that I lived in Regina!   I still got to hang out with Tommy a bit though…

Friday Fun Link – Shelfari (Jan 19, 2007)

Most people reading this are probably familiar with LibraryThing,
a web site that allows you to easily enter and catalogue your books,
see the libraries of others (including those with a similar collection
to yours) and much more. But LibraryThing is not the only site in this
area.

Shelfari is the latest addition to the “social-networking via your book collection” world. Web 2.0 news site, TechCrunch covers this new site and a few of its competitors in a recent post which also generated some good discussion among TechCrunch readers.

Michael Gorman

John M. did a post about Michael Gorman after hearing about one of his books on my blog.  To keep the cross-blog dialogue flowing, I thought this might be a fitting time to post a comment I made about Gorman on our “Advocacy in Libraries” message board. 

I posted the following on the week we had to watch a video of Gorman addressing the CLA in Vancouver when he was the ALA's President-elect.  Classmates were posting their thoughts about Gorman's speech (which was very good and engaging – much like his books) but I wasn't sure if they had any background on the furor around his “blog people” article which I thought was especially relevant because we were using other, similar types of new, cutting edge technologies (streaming video, e-learning suites) to take an U of T class that we otherwise wouldn't have had access to.  Also, simply because it was important to know that this was somebody who was leading the largest library organization in the world who had made some incredibly disparaging remarks about a large portion of that organization's membership.  (I don't have the same venom for him that many do because of his remarks and like John M., would love to have a beer with Mr. Gorman, just to hear his thoughts and experiences on the library world and beyond.)

So anyhow, here's what I posted.  (If you haven't before, you should read the “blog people” article I link to in the first line.  And man, do I love that “Melville Dewey” line in this post!)

Here's a link to Micheal Gorman's original “Blog People
article. I should've linked to it in my last post rather than going
with the (ahem) rather inflammatory quote that I did use. [Note: I originally linked to a Librarian In Black blog response to Gorman's original article] Apologies for
the that. But obviously, like Wendy [note: our instructor] mentioned in her weekly update, I
too have definite feelings about this (although in the opposite
direction).


I think Michael Gorman does a grave disservice to
the profession with divisive comments like the ones in this article,
whether they are meant ironically or not. Saying: “Given the quality of the writing in the blogs I have seen, I
doubt that many of the Blog People are in the habit of sustained
reading of complex texts” insults
pro-technology librarians, many of whom have the same MLIS degree that
he does. That reeks of elitism and is exactly what I think libraries
(and librarians) should avoid at all costs.


For the President-elect of the ALA to happily admit that “Until
recently, I had not spent much time thinking about blogs or Blog
People” is simply shocking. Whether or not, you're a fan of technology
(or its potential for libraries), librarians are in the business of
information and blogs are part of that web of information. That would
be like Melville Dewey standing up at the first ALA convention in 1876
and saying “I have not spent much time thinking about that new
invention the telephone or the 'Telephone People' who like it so.”

The reason of the outcry in the blogosphere was his attack on Google's digitization plan for the contents of hundreds of thousands of books. He says this project is “a triumph of hope and boosterism over reality”, I would reply with Michael Geist's
comment from his session on copyright at the CLA conference that
“Google Books has the potential to be nothing less than a card
catalogue for the 21st Century.” (By the way, Michael Geist has one of
the best blogs around having recently completed a “30 Days of DRM”  series of posts that was as timely and informative as anything you'll find in scholarly articles or monographs.)

Gorman says: “If
a fraction of the [money being spent on the Google Books digitization
project] were devoted to buying books and
providing librarians for the library-starved children of California,
the effort would be of far more use to humanity and society.” but his
geo-centrism is telling. I think that the Google Books project has FAR
more potential for usefulness to all humanity than improving the
library collections in a single state. For example, right this  moment, Google Books allows me to find 201 references to him using the search string [“Michael Gorman” + librarian] in a wide variety of books – something
that would have been impossible prior to this project. If Michael
Gorman's work were of interest to someone in Bel Air *or* Belize, Google Books would
allow them find it.

Wendy observes that the hue
& outcry that followed the Blog People article could've been better
spent in library advocacy or other endeavours and this is very true.
But I would argue that perhaps instead of writing articles that divide
the profession and lead to this type of outcry in the first place,
Gorman would be better off spending his time advocating for those
library-starved children in his home state (which, while we're on the topic of starving children, is a good place to mention that, if California were a
country, would have the 7th highest GDP of any nation in the world.)

Hmm, that just kinda peters out a bit, eh?  I should've had a better summary line.  Oh well.  Anyhow, here's my attempt now:

Libraries are about sharing information freely.  Google seems to be about sharing information freely (although technically, they are a commerical entity and the information is paid for by advertisers – more on that someday in the future.)  Bloggers are about sharing information freely.  So why the animosity, elitisim and divisiveness? 

Halfway There, Oscar!

Oscar turned 20 weeks today.  Happy birthday uteroversary, baby!

Jill recently pointed out my love of lists (if you ask me, lists are the letters of the 21st century) and so here's another one for the collection…

FIVE THINGS I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT PREGNANCY

1. Nobody ever tells you how scary the first trimester is.  You hear stories about how wonderful pregnancy is (and it is) but no one tells you how nervous and stressed out you'll be about every moment, especially for the first few months when something like 20% of miscarriages happen. 
2. Most medical practitioners count a pregnancy as ten months long, not nine.
3. It's a tough job but somebody has to volunteer to toughen up the nipples before the baby comes.   [Edit: First, I can't believe I posted this on the Internet.  Second, believe it or not, this point was Shea's idea, mainly as an excuse to use that emoticon.  Third, that little yellow guy isn't supposed to represent me as it may appear based on my wording.  It's supposed to represent a wash cloth – honest!]
4. There are people on YouTube who have a belly fetish and will bookmark videos of any belly-related clips including one of your wife getting a doppler ultrasound
5.  Contrary to what I thought when I was six, the belly button has nothing to do with the conception of a child. 

(Bonus: The baby's eyes aren't closed at birth – that's kittens!)

"Warriors and Wusses" – Joel Stein

Reading a Joel Stein article in Time magazine led me to this piece he wrote which got quite a lot of attention and controversy early last year.  It’s about what a cop-out it is to be anti-war but to say you “support the troops.” 

When you volunteer for the U.S. military, you pretty much know you’re
not going to be fending off invasions from Mexico and Canada. So you’re
willingly signing up to be a fighting tool of American imperialism, for
better or worse. Sometimes you get lucky and get to fight ethnic
genocide in Kosovo, but other times it’s Vietnam.

It’s written from an American perspective and a bit awkward because he’s writing about something which is deadly serious while being known mainly as a humourist.  (Truth be told, I don’t think a lot of the humour in the piece works and in fact, weakens it significantly.) 

But I’m glad to find somebody who’s enough of a “hero” to say this.  (Hero, by the way is another extremely overused phrase in our society which, like “support the troops” is a major cop-out position.  To me, the people who died in the World Trade Centre attacks were not heroes and I would argue that 99% of the firemen and policemen who died weren’t either.  They were brave.  They were dedicated.  They were selfless.  But they weren’t heroes.) 

Anyhow, if you’re against the war in either Iraq or Afgahnistan, the only way the words “support the troops” should be part of your vocabulary is if you say “I support bringing the troops home.”

(Now, where’d I put that “rant” tag?)

Here’s the full article:

Warriors and wusses – Los Angeles Times

[Edit: 2013-08/26 – here’s another article I came across making similar points about the many problems with “Support The Troops”.]