Friday Fun Link – The Daily Show Makes Entire Archives Available Online (Oct 20, 2007)

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart has put up over 13 000 segments going back to 1999.  That's pretty cool…or at least it would be if I could get any of the videos in the archives to load. 

Maybe the site's just being hammered with traffic because it's so new.  But it almost makes you wish some of these media giant properties would skip the proprietary site designs and media players and just put it all up on YouTube instead. 

[Edit: Just saw that there’s also a proposal to make all of the books shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize available for free online as well. Following up the Radiohead announcement,
that now makes the announcement of a major music, TV and book release
for free online within a very short period of time. So, the big
question is – which will be the first big Hollywood movie to follow
this model? We should all avoid buzzwords where ever possible but this
really does feel like a paradigm shift. Oh, and the commentator I
linked to about Radiohead says they won’t make any money but the
goodwill they recieve from fans for the move will pay off in the long
term. But another commentator speculates that
Radiohead have made $10 million already,
more than they made from their last three albums combined. The truth is
probably somewhere between these two extremes but I’d lean towards this
being a very profitable move for the band.)]


(via MetaFilter)

Would You Work At This Library?

Would you work for this library?  I would in a heartbeat. 

(See the end of the post for the Internet company I cribbed this hiring manifesto from.  I've re-worded it so it sounds like a library wrote it.)

Our Library delights people
It is satisfying to work at a company that people love. When you wear Library clothing, strangers regale you with tales of how much they like our service. We're ranked number one in customer satisfaction across the entire public sector, narrowly besting such great services as the fire department and the police department. And we're stretching every day to make our service even better.

Much of our success is from our creative use of Internet technology and community to help people discover books and information they will love. Each person has very unique tastes, and we offer hundreds of thousands of books spanning centuries of publishing, so helping people find books tailored to their particular taste is both a huge opportunity and huge challenge.

Our passion is not completely altruistic. When people love the books they read, they become more passionate about books, and that helps our organization grow. As we grow, we get better at information management, and help people get even more enjoyment from books and information. As a Library employee, you power this virtuous cycle.

We're democratizing information distribution
Producers of small books struggle to create awareness of their books. Many books go undiscovered by people who would have loved them. We're changing that. We promote a small book as widely as a big new release to the particular patrons we think will love that little information.

For example, Shelf Monkey is a mid-sized press publication that few people saw when it was released in 2007. But many Library patrons rated Shelf Monkey highly, so our site promotes it to many people, and it is now one of the top 10 borrowed books of all time at our Library, outperforming such blockbusters as “The Road” by Cormac McCarthy and “The Da Vinci Code” by Dan Brown.

As we grow, the market for small books grows, giving a voice to authors and publishers everywhere.

Values Matter
Lots of organizations have lofty value statements; but sometimes they are not reflective of what the organization actually values. To understand the real values of a company, read how people interact with one another, who gets promoted, and who is let go.

At our Library we value – and reward – the following nine behaviors. The more these sound like you, the more likely you are to thrive at our Library. Each year we conduct a 360 review in which we give each other feedback on performance relative to these nine values. Most people find this refreshingly honest and healthy. We value:

* Judgment

Your judgment calls turn out well (people, technical, business, and creative judgment calls). Your insights are influential and important. You are an expert at what you do and a source that other employees look upon for guidance.

* Productivity

You are very effective in getting work done. What you accomplish amazes people.

* Creativity

You are inventive. You re-conceptualize issues to come up with innovative but practical solutions to hard problems.

* Intelligence

You think broadly and strategically. You make subtle connections others miss. You absorb large amounts of information rapidly. You learn fast. You can change directions rapidly when appropriate.

* Honesty

You are known for your candor. You avoid partial truth and tinted truth. You are non-political and straightforward when you disagree with others. You only say things about people you will say to their face.

* Communication

You are effective communicating both in meetings and one on one. You practice Seek First to Understand, then to be Understood.

* Selflessness
You are perceived to be guided by what you think is best for the Library, rather than best for yourself. You are ego-less when it comes to finding the best ideas and interacting with others.

* Reliability

Colleagues perceive they can depend upon you. You are not prone to flakiness, anger, or impulsiveness.

* Passion

You care deeply about the Library's success and your colleagues know it. Your thirst for excellence is infectious and inspiring.


Rules annoy us
Rules inhibit creativity and entrepreneurship, leading to a lack of innovation. Over time this leads a company to being both less fun and less successful.  Instead of adding rules as we grow, our solution to increased complexity is to increase talent density. Great people make great judgment calls, despite ambiguity.

We believe in freedom and responsibility, not rules.

For example, our vacation policy for salaried employees is “take some” – there is no limit on vacation as long you get your work done. Similarly, our travel expense policy is “travel as you would on your own nickel.” That's it. No soul-sapping policy manuals for us. In our last five years as public institution, growing from a $10m to a $20 million budget, our commitment to freedom and responsibility has only grown.

We have found that by avoiding rules we can better attract the creative mavericks that drive innovation, and our business is all about innovation. We are mitigating the big risk technology companies face (obsolescence), by taking on small risks (running without rules).

Our only absolute rule is integrity, and violations almost always result in termination.

We pay well
We believe that one outstanding employee does more and costs less than two adequate performers. Thus we try to pay at the top of the market, and to have only outstanding employees. Our compensation is guided by market rates and performance, rather than seniority or resume.

We focus on large salaries, rather than on bonuses and perks, to provide employees maximum flexibility. Additionally, we offer investment vehicles including fully-vested stock options granted every month, an employee stock purchase program, and a company-matched RRSP program, to enable employees to make decisions to suit their individual financial objectives.

Consistently outstanding people
We're a high-performance team, not a family.

A strong family is together forever – no matter what. A strong company, on the other hand, is more like a professional sports team, which is built to win. It is the responsibility of management at every level to assemble the team that wins big.

To accomplish this, we seek to fill every position in our company with exceptional performers. In many companies, adequate performance gets a modest raise. At our Library, adequate performance gets a generous severance package.

For us, the cost of having “adequate” in any position is simply too large, when we could have “extraordinary”. Extraordinary performance means excellence in the nine values described above. Plentiful extraordinary talent makes for a high-functioning organization.

The benefit of a high-performance culture is that you work with consistently outstanding colleagues, which is exhilarating. You do your best work, you learn the most, and you achieve the highest professional satisfaction, when you're surrounded by excellence.

We hire people who are great at what they do and we give them the freedom to practice their craft without endless buy-in meetings. The result is that you can get things done quickly and are able to see the impact immediately. Our Library is small enough that you can make a difference, yet big enough to change the way millions of people enjoy books and information.

We love books
Many of us are into books; some of us are just developing the love. Each year, many of us flock to conferences, book fairs, festivals and so on, and employees get an unlimited Library account to gorge themselves on books. Meetings are filled with book references, and laughter breaks out often.

We live at the crossroads of technology and information, and we're passionate about both.

We're creating an amazing future
The Internet is changing everything.

We dream of a world where information content is open, global, and instantly deliverable to any screen from cell-phone to laptop to living-room TV. We dream of a world where
everyone is passionate about books and great storytelling. We dream of a world where unknown authors with a vision get discovered and nurtured, so they go on to write their second book. We dream of a world where the Library is respected as the organization that helped facilitate all this.


Our book borrowing statistics are growing and we are investing heavily in this area. Our Web software, which creates a custom Web site for each patron, is still in its infancy. We are constantly improving our integrated library system which handles thousands of book circulations to and from patrons daily.

In 2007, we added online downloads as a new way for Library patrons to read books. Thousands of books are available to read, instantly, right on the Library Web site. The initial reviews have been quite positive. Every year we'll add more books, and over time we'll make it possible to read these books on more devices.

The age of being able to instantly read books over the Internet is just beginning, and we're starting out strongly. It's going to be a fun next ten years at our Library.

A final point about respect: great companies earn the respect of their customers, suppliers, investors and employees by making and keeping certain promises. We promise our patrons stellar service, our suppliers a valuable partner, our funders sustained, successful growth, and our employees huge impact and opportunity.

We aim to keep these promises.

Confessions of a TOG

John M. has posted some reflections on reaching the halfway point of the MLIS program as a part-time student.  He started in the same term as me which was Jan 2006 but because he's only taking 1-2 classes per term, he isn't scheduled to finish until August 2009.  As someone who did the program in the least time possible (one year), it's interesting to compare and contrast our experiences. 

In the post, he also happens to quote from the “Mature Student” profile in my The Twelve Types of Library School Students where I say “[The Mature student] believes the class is a personal dialogue between them and the professor.”

I hope John doesn't think I was referring to him with this line!  The truth is that this was a reference to something going way back to my own long ago undergrad days.  At the time, a friend and I were joking around and came up with a term for the mature students who were in many of our classes and who exhibited this behaviour – “Token Old/Outspoken Guy/Gal” or “TOG” for short. 

The ironic part?  When I returned to library school ten years after convocating as a undergrad, I have to admit that I became a bit of a TOG myself.  I didn't sit front row centre but I did frequently find myself saying “Well, when I was working with this writer…” or “Actually, in my experience, Acccess Copyright does this…” or “I was planning an event once and <tip> really helped make a difference.”

I thought a lot about it and realise now why this happens (since I'm now such a wisened old man compared to the snot-nosed punk I once was). 

A big part of it is that is really is a reflection of mature students honestly having more real world experience than many of their younger colleagues and wanting to share this knowledge.  Another reason (which John mentioned) is the discomfort factor.  Many mature students are returning to University after a long absence and there is a need to assert that we belong somehow.  Finally, some mature students really are egotists who love to hear the sound of their own voice – even if it probably sounds like an adult in a Charlie Brown cartoon to most people in the class.

[Edit: 2008-01-10 – no one will likely ever see this – if you *do* read this, please post a comment so I know people actually occasionally read old articles on this site – but anyhow, I came across an Onion article titled “Guy In Philosophy Class Needs To Shut The Fuck Up” which I thought would be an appropriate addition here.]

Your Salary

This site is pretty cool.  It gives you a visual depiction of what your salary is on a hourly/weekly/yearly basis and even shows a ticker of how much money you earn as you look at the page (especially fun if you look at it while at work!)

In other work-related news, I wore a cardigan to the office today.  Un-ironically. 

Frank Stronach Changes His Tune on Unions

Whether you believe unions still have a role to play in society or not, this is pretty surprising.  Frank Stronach, the owner of the multi-billion dollar auto parts manufacturing company, Magna International has agreed to a deal with the CAW to allow unionization in his factories.

(Hey, if his daughter can flip-flop, why can't dad? )

“”I did say over the years I disagree with some of the philosophies of
unions,” Mr. Stronach acknowledged at a news conference at Magna
headquarters in Aurora, Ont. Monday. “But at the same time, we all have
to change. Business has to change. Unions have to change. We have one
mandate: To be efficient and to be competitive.””


CAW President, Buzz Hargrove weighed in on the agreement as well:
“This new deal is a chance for Magna and the CAW to show you can deal in
labour management relationships differently, Mr. Hargrove insisted.
“When you don't start out with a fight over whether or not the workers
are entitled to have a union, then you can do a lot of things,” he
said.

Oh, and something else – I have a category/keyword “jobs” for external, non-directly-related-to-me employment type stories and one called “work” for stuff that is directly related to the work I do and have done although, now that I think about it, those are probably backwards.  Also, I probably forget which is which and mix them up on a regular basis anyhow. 

Pace Slept Eight Hours In A Row Last Night

Just wanted to record that milestone for posterity.  His mom and I probably put that up there with first food and walking right about now!  Hopefully tonight will be a repeat.

10 Great Music Videos

Sometimes it boggles my mind how much is available on YouTube.  I've taken full advantage by posting all kinds of clips on this blog (er, but watch them before the copyreich people get them taken down.)

Up until now, I've sort of limited myself to posting one clip per entry (I think the most I ever did at once was three.)  But for something different, I thought I'd do a list that's naturally suited to one of the most popular categories on YouTube – music videos (especially since MuchMusic and MTV apparently no longer play them.)

This isn't a “These are the absolute best music videos I've ever seen” as that would be impossible to compile.  Instead, it's more of an impressionistic stream of consciousness list of some of the videos I like for all kinds of reasons – great direction, great match of music and lyrics, innovative ideas.

No real criteria used otherwise except that I was trying not to pick the obvious ones.  Oh, and apparently I really like videos that play with time in some way or do something unique instead of just having the singer lipsynching – have celebrities and regular folk lip synching instead, show people listening and reacting to the song on headphones or just show a stereo speaker playing the song. 

On that note, here you go…

“Bastards of Young” – The Replacements

“Rock Star” – Nickelback (yeah, seriously)
 

“Return To Innocence” – Enigma

“Street Spirit (Fade Out)” – Radiohead

“At the Hundredth Meridian” – The Tragically Hip

“Here It Goes Again” – OK Go
 

“Praise You” – Fatboy Slim

“The Universal” – Blur

“Vidrar” – Sigur Ros

“First Day of My Life” – Bright Eyes

“What's The Frequency, Kenneth” – REM

“Right Now” – Van Halen

“Hurt” – Johnny Cash
 

Friday Fun Link – What The F***? Why We Curse (Oct 12, 2007)

I’ve done a pretty fucking exhaustive swearing-related FFL before but this fucking article is a nice fucking addition to that list. Fuck yeah!

Pace's Kindergarten Class

Since Pace was born, I've sort of had my ear tuned to what other friends and acquaintances have been naming their babies.  I grew up with one of the most common boy's names of the 1970's and although I didn't hate it, there's definitely something out-of-whack when you're in a graduating class of 44, half of those are presumably male and of those 22, fully 3 (or 15%) have the same first name.

I admit that probably played at least a small role in the name we chose for Pace.  As I've mentioned, picking a boy's name was infinitely harder for us than picking a girl's name – in fact, we had two completely acceptable options for a girl, long before we even planned to get pregnant!

As I explained to someone who complimented the name on Facebook, what we were going for with Pace was a couple things – we wanted something unique (and not just “add an x” to change “Jackson” to “Jaxon” unique) but that wouldn't require Pace to spell out his name for people for the rest of his life (again, see “Jaxon” alternate spelling for an example.)  Of course, we're beginning to realise that Pace doesn't always fit this criteria and we'll still get “Pace?  How do you spell that?” but I guess that's what we get for picking a fairly uncommon name, no matter what it was.

Anyhow, to get back to my initial point, here are the names of some babies we know who were born within the last year or three.  Definitely not a Jason or Jennifer among them and it looks like we're not the only ones going for that unique yet simple name for our child (I blame Chris Martin and Gwenyth Paltrow)…

Alise
Amara
Anese
Anise
Brooklyn
Cooper
Cora
Dennon
Eamon
Emmerson
Emersyn
Garrett
Grace
Gracie
Hali
Hayden
Hudson
Ian
Jeren
Kiran
Krisily
Kyan
Lennox
Liam
Maxwell
Mandred
Nadia
Noah
Olivia
Reginald
Ryce (I thought it would be pronounced “Reece” but it's “Rice”.  And you thought “Pace” was daring! )
Saron
Sawyer
Sierra
Sophia
Tyson
Wyatt
Zia

An Analysis of My Picks in the Facebook Hockey Pool App

When I was in Calgary, I went in a hockey pool with my cousin and his buddies every year.  The rules we used were fairly standard in that the team you picked at the draft was the team you were stuck with for the year (in retrospect, dropping your lowest scoring player – ie. the guy who got injured in week three – would've been a nice rule to have.  But I'm not bitter about drafting Paul Kariya in 2003.)

But beyond that, this pool had an interesting wrinkle I really liked – instead of everybody paying a set entry fee ($20 or whatever) and drafting who they felt was the best available at the time, you paid $1 per million of salary.  So if you drafted a team like you owed the Rangers or Red Wings of the early 2000's, you were going to put $70 into the pot.  If you worked the draft like a small market Canadian team, you're on the hook for $35 maybe with the chance for a really big payoff.  Instead of drafting someone like Peter Forsberg or Jaromir Jagr in the early rounds, you'd see guys trying to pick sleepers who were on low money contracts and poised to break out for big points (My proudest moment was picking sleeper Jarome Iginla in 01-02 for a buck seventy when he had his big breakout season, scoring 52 goals and 44 assists and jumped to a $5.50 player the next year.) 

Another great memory was when one regular couldn't make the draft when we did it at our place so Shea was enlisted to draft for him.  Using a unique strategy of “picking the most expensive guy available” and/or “picking the guy with the funniest name – ie. Satan, Palffy, etc.”, she ended up winning the guy some cash when he finished in second place! 

So anyhow, that's all a long intro to say that I haven't done a hockey pool in a couple years but was glad to see that Facebook has one.  They're using the “pick one player from a group of six similar players” style of draft which is pretty fun too.  Categories include “Elite”, “Sizzle”, “Fizzle?”, “European”, “Goon”, “Goalie”, etc.  Plus they're allowing four trades throughout the year in case you pick a bum.   (Oh, and they also let you name your team – I'm “Head Tale” – so if you're playing too, feel free to post your team name as a comment so I know whose butt I'm kicking! )

Here are my picks and justifications
Elite – Sidney Crosby
Seemed like a no-brainer.  So far, Crosby = 1 points.  Heatley = 7.  Yep, I have no brain.

Sizzle! – Jarome Iginla
Always a soft spot for “Iggy” but also a considered pick since Iggy was third in points per game average last year and only a big injury kept him from ending up in the top three for league scoring.  Off to his typical slow start but he always seems to pick it up as the year goes on so I remain hopeful and am unlikely to trade him.

Fizzle? – Mats Sundin
I hate the Leafs like any good Canadian outside the greater metropolitan Toronto area should.  But I've always liked Mats Sundin and he's serving me well so far by leading this group.

Expecting Big Things – Marc Savard
Probably my stinkiest pick in the draft.  Made the classic draft mistake of chasing somebody who did something good the year before (Savard put up great numbers of a fairly crappy team) instead of going for somebody with potential for this year – ie. Paul Statsny who is kicking ass so far.

European Flair
I picked the wrong Red Wing – Datsyuk has 2 points, Zetterberg has 8.

Veteran Leaders
Saku Koivu and like a lot of picks, my bias towards Canadian teams is showing (but unfortunately, I didn't pick any of the Ottawa's big three who are totally dominating so far.)

Warhorses
Nik Lidstrom is dominating this group so far.  Yay me!

Future Norris
Dion Phanuef.  Beyond my Flames fandom, this guy almost beat a 20 year old record for goals by a rookie defenceman when he scored 20 in 2005-06 .  Considering how wide open the NHL was in 1998 when Brian Leetch set the record (23), that's pretty impressiv
e!


Goalies
Miikka Kiprusoff and see the last entry for very similar reasoning – Flames fandom + record setting performances.

Goons
Shane O'Brien.  Is there even fighting in the “new” NHL?  This one was a toss-up and also has my least favourite aspect of this pool by far – every PIM gets you a point (the draft we did in Calgary only gave you one quarter of a point as a quality goon should be able to get 400 PIM and a top scoring player will get around 100 points.)  The way it's set-up right now, your whole pool result will be completely dominated by the goon you pick.