Canadian Tire Customer Service Fail

It started innocently enough.  A couple weeks ago, my dad called me at work to ask if I could stop at Canadian Tire on my way home to pay for some mirror extenders he'd ordered for his truck. 

“They wouldn't take your credit card over the phone?” I asked. 

“No.  They said you had to pay in person.” 

I guess with the chance of someone scamming them, they use a “better safe than sorry” approach.  I didn't realise how far they'd take that sentiment though!

So, although it was a slight inconvenience to get off the bus on my way home to pay for the order then sit around waiting for the next bus to come along, I did as he'd asked with no problems. 

Dad had mentioned he'd be away for a few weeks when he placed the order.  But I decided to ask how long it would take for them to come in if I got a chance to swing by and pick them up.  I was told it would be about four or five days. 

So today, when Shea and I decided to take a spontaneous drive out to a lake near my hometown for a picnic with Pace, I decided to whip into Canadian Tire on our way out of the city to see if the mirrors were in.  If they were, I could leave them at M&D's house and then they wouldn't have to make a special trip into the city for them. 

I went to Canadian Tire and headed to the auto parts counter while Shea went to look to see if any patio furniture caught her eye.  I mentioned the order to the young guy at the counter and he said “Oh yeah, I've seen them around.  I'll grab them.” 

He brought them out but the lady he was working with asked him to go with another customer to a different area of the store and she'd finish helping me.  I'd seen her rudely boss the young guy around once already while I was waiting in line so had a bad feeling about how this might go knowing I'd just popped in and didn't have the receipt on me. 

“I'm here to pick up some mirrors my dad ordered,”  I said “I don't have the receipt but I have the credit card I used to pay for them.  Is that okay?”

“You need the receipt to pick them up.”   (“Oh-oh, here we go,” I thought.)  I explained that we were heading out of town and had decided to stop by to see if the mirrors were in so the receipt was at home somewhere.

“You'll have to go get it.” 

“Well, we're already on our way out of town and I was hoping to drop them off at my parents' this afternoon.  I mean, the whole reason I had to pay in the first place was because you wouldn't accept my father's credit card over the phone.” 

“Well, that doesn't help because we don't have the credit card number with this order.”  (What?  That surprised me.  They just had a copy of the written order they'd taken over the phone, it did show that I'd paid for them but they didn't have the card number connected to this transaction apparently.)

“They're for my dad.  I can give you his name, phone number and address if that helps.”  I start listing off this info, thinking if she sees that I know all the details of the order, that'll clear up any thoughts that I'm doing some sort of weird mirror stealing scam.  

“Just a second, I'll call the manager.” 

I only heard her side of the conversation but it doesn't look good…”yes, they have the same last name.”…”No, he says he doesn't have the receipt”…”yes, there's a cell number here.”  She hangs up the phone. 

“He wants me to try calling your dad.” 

By this point, I'm getting pretty frustrated.  If I'm sort of a scam artist trying to steal seventy bucks worth of mirrors from Canadian Tire, don't you think I'd be smart enough to give the number of someone in on the scam in case they wanted to try calling?

She tries to call my dad's cell and with how my luck is going, of course, doesn't get an answer. 

“I don't understand,” I say.  “How would I know there were mirrors in for (dad's name) of (my hometown)  if I was looking to steal something?”  (I think but don't say that mirror extenders wouldn't be the thing I'd try to steal if that's what I was doing.  Maybe some mag wheels or an expensive car stereo or something?)

“Well, I'm not saying this is you…” (“actually”, I think, “you kinda are implying this by not giving me the stupid mirrors I've already paid for!) “…but we sometimes have people who pick stuff up for other people then the original person comes in and claims they never got it.” 

“Really?”  (I later think of the perfect retort for this – at Wal-Mart when you ask for “cash back” on your debit purchase, they make you sign your receipt to acknowledge receipt of the money.  Then, if you later try to claim the clerk didn't give you the money, you have to show the receipt to prove it.  I should've just thought to ask if I could sign the receipt to acknowledge that I'd picked them up.)

Anyhow, by now, I know I'm either going to have to go home and try to find the receipt or just leave the mirrors for another time.  Shea and Pace have arrived and in my mind, they shouldn't profile people when assessing their risk as scam artists but c'mon, I look even less like a scammer then my shady librarian self normally does now that my family is there with me! 

I thought of asking for the manager but she'd already been on the phone with them and obviously, the manager was just going to follow the rules too rather than using a bit of common sense (or come to think of it, even offering to come down and assess the situation directly.)   

“So let me get this straight.  You're not going to give me the mirrors unless I go home to find the receipt wherever it is.  And you're going to get my dad make a special trip in from an hour out of town which will cost him more in gas than the mirrors did, all because that you wouldn't take his credit card that I'm here in the first place?  Plus you probably still want him to bring in the receipt to claim the mirrors, even though I've already paid for them and the charge has already gone through on my credit card???”

“I guess so.  Yeah, pretty much.”

“Nice customer service!” I blurt and turn to leave.  (Needless to say, we didn't buy a patio set either!) 

Now, I know I don't have as many Twitter followers as Adam Savage of MythBusters.  And I can't write a song like Dave Carroll of the band, Sons of Maxwell.  I'm also very aware that this isn't nearly to the level of an $11,000 cell roaming fee or an expensive guitar broken by a baggage handler. 

But just like those two examples, I think this was also a case of a company following its rules at the expense of common sense.  And I really strongly believe that companies need to be aware that it's no longer the case where if someone has a bad customer service, they'll tell ten of their friends like was the popular understanding before the Internet.  Now, they might tell the hundreds who read thier blog.  Or it might hit the social networks and be seen by thousands. 

So maybe someone at Canadian Tire will see this post and the next time a customer who wants to pick up an item they already paid for AND can name all the details about the order AND they share a surname with the person who phoned in the order but couldn't pay for the order himself because they wouldn't accept his credit card number over the phone, they'll use just a bit of common sense. 

(Since this is a big negative rant and I'm also aware that whether we do it online or not, we *do* tend to repeat our bad experiences much more than our good ones, So I will also report that we recently had to make an insurance claim with Co-operators and the service we received was exceptional, the flexibility and understanding given to us went above and beyond and they even had a rule we didn't know about which ended up meaning we didn't even have to pay our deductible on our claim!  Yep, all of this from an insurance company – the type of organization that's regularly seen as happy to take your premiums but loathe to pay out anything if they can help it.  Meanwhile, Canadian Tire does everything they can to make me suggest Rona or Parts Source or pretty much anywhere else, the next time I (or anyone in my family) needs something!  Go figure…) 

[Edit: I looked more closely at the receipt after this whole ordeal.  There *was* a place you could sign to acknowledge the receipt of goods!]

Out With The Old, In WIth the New(s): Two Views of The Future of Newspapers

I recently came across two articles that propose radically different visions of the future of newspapers.  The two articles took specific interest in the New York Times which many consider the “newspaper of record” for the United States but which, like many newspapers, has been hemorrhaging money in recent years

In the first article, a former Baltimore Sun reporter who went on to produce “The Wire” TV show, proposes that the NYT and the Washington Post need to each build a pay wall for their respective content at the same time and with a unified front.  (this, via a MetaFilter post which also informs that the Times is already looking at $5/month subscriptions and the Associated Press is looking at using DRM for their content. )

In the other article, Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, proposes the “New New York Times“, a new media version of the Gray Lady that he thinks could become one of the most visited, profitable news sites online within five years  A telling line: “Journalism isn't dead; just the old business way of doing things is.” 

I'm a pretty big believer that print media is on the way out.  Just look at the chart of the financial performance of CanWest media (owner of most major news dailies in Canada as well as a variety of TV stations) for the past five years.  Not good. 

This is a pretty small sample size but here's another indicator – my dad reads the Leader Post every single day, pretty much cover-to-cover, and along with the CKCK TV news, these two outlets (along with coffeee row of course!) comprise his two main source of news about what's happening in the world. 

On the other hand, I maybe look at the Leader Post once a week, if that.  And when I do, it's rarely the dead tree version.  Instead, I get the majority of my information about what's happening in the world, both locally and beyond, from a much wider variety of online sources – not just the web sites of local traditional media companies like the Leader Post and CBC but also web sites connected to independent papers like the Prairie Dog and Sasquatch, blogs by local authors as well as numerous other web sites with a national and international focus. 

Again, it's only anecdotal evidence but the next generation is supposedly even more attuned to using the Internet for all of their information needs (heavy emphasis on “all”).  When you mix it with the “culture of free” that developed and continues to grow online, (Full disclosure: I'm currently reading “Free: The Future of a Radical Price” by Chris Anderson, editor of Wired magazine, which is another reason this subject is in the forefront of my brain), I think the inevitable is obvious. 

Companies, organizations and artists that find a way to give away something of value for free can make massive profits in other ways – whether it's Google's ad network subsidizing their various free services or Radiohead's donation model for their latest CD making them more profit than any of their traditionally released CD's.  (I'm not done it yet so maybe I'm wrong but one disappointing element of Anderons's book after a quick glance through the index is that there is no mention of libraries which I'd argue are the original free information oulet and have also done a lot to inform the “free” ethos of the Internet.  After all, how many of today's tech geeks spent their formative years in the safe confines of their local public library, among rows and rows of books and magazines that were literally free for the taking?) 

Friday Fun Link – Which Songs Do I Have The Most Copies of On My Computer? (July 31, 2009)

I'm trying to free up some space on my hard drive (70 GB of music on a 200 GB drive will do that to you) so am looking through my duplicate MP3 files (which make up ~10 GB of that collection). 

Looking closer, I see that there are a few songs that I have no less than SIX different copies of, all by the same artist (ie. not cover versions by other artists.) 

Some are because the song was released on the original album then on a greatest hits album and maybe one (or even more) live albums or reissues.  Then I also end up with copies of the same song due to some collections I've downloaded like “Rolling Stone's Top 500 Songs”, “Top 500 Alternative Songs”, “Top 101 Love Songs” – stuff like that – where the song might show up a couple times as well. 

Here are the tunes that I have six copies of…
John Lennon – “Give Peace A Chance”
John Lennon – “Imagine”
John Lennon – “Woman” 
(The first two are Lennon songs I'd expect to show up in enough places to get me up to six copies but “Woman” was a bit of a surprise.  I guess it hit a couple “Love Song” anthologies I have to put it over the top.)
Michael Jackson – “Billie Jean”
REM – “Losing My Religion”

The solution seems pretty straight-forward – every time I see a copy of a song that I know is the exact same version of a song I already have (ie. one from the original album, one from the greatest hits collection but not one from the original album and one from a live album) – delete it.  Which works in a digital landscape. 

But my problem is that I grew up in the analog age and I still respect the integrity of the album and even of the “Various Artists” collections.  So even for those “101 Best Love Songs” groupings, I'm reluctant to delete the duplicates because then it becomes “83 Love Songs That Happen To Be Songs You Don't Already Have Copies Of” and the integrity of the original 101 songs is lost. 

Yeah, stupid, I know but that's what I'm struggling with today.  (As that hard drive fills up even more, I suspect I'll become a lot more easily convinced to delete the duplicates.)   

SILS Project Will Create One Library Card for Everyone in Saskatchewan

I've written about the Saskatchewan Single Integrated Library System before but now I see this massive project to bring all of our regional and city library systems together in a single consortium arrangement is getting some mainstream media coverage as well. 

A job for a librarian who will coordinate the technical aspects of the project has been posted as well. 

Chilly Chili in Regina

Stopped by the Regina KidSport's Chili Cook-off in downtown Regina today for a bowl of delicious NDP chili (no, it wasn't vegetarian for those who think all NDP'ers are granola crunchers.) 

The various Regina and area MLA's who were tending the table were being coy with whose recipe it was so I developed a couple theories – either new leader Dwain Lingenfelter was slaving over a hot stove all night.  Or they just placed a big order with Tim Horton's.  I've got a loonie on the second explanation. 

Music Monday – "I've got to be unstoppable/I've got to be unstoppable/Eh, eh you don't like/eh, eh, eh you don't like."

Found this clip on Reddit and though it's a bit different than my usual Music Monday clips, I thought it was worth sharing as it's definitely got music in it and it's a pretty cool visual too! (Of course, it'll probably come out that this is a viral advertising campaign for Coke One or something. )


But assuming it's legit, I'm sure there's a lesson here about the differences between being a leader and being a follower. 

The clip starts with one lone guy doing what I've heard described as the “monkey dance”, that same dance you always see some neo-hippie doing off at the side of the stage at Folk Festivals.  But the difference here is that he eventually attracts a crowd who all dance with him (I still can't decide if that first couple guys who go up to join him are doing it in a slightly mocking way or if they're sincere as well.) 

I've been thinking a lot about leadership, reading a lot about leadership and trying to distill my own philosophy into something concise.  And what I've come up with is this: I wonder if, at its simplest, leadership is about being actively engaged – with your work, with your life, with your world and what's around you? 

That crowd sitting and listening to the performance is engaged but in a fairly passive way – perhaps in a way that many of us are passively engaged at work or at home or school or whatever.  But the brave, unique soul choosing to dance to the music is actively engaged.  And by this small act of leadership, he inspires his fellows to be actively engaged as well.  As I said, pretty cool. 

Or maybe not…man, I'm thirsty

(I swear that I didn't know when I made my Coke One joke that there would actually be a story about Coke using possibly illegal viral marketing techniques.  But of course there was…)

An Unplanned (But Greatly Enjoyed) Blog Holiday

As is probably quite obvious, I try to post to this blog on a daily basis at the minimum.  I occasionally miss the odd day (and even then, I sometimes back date posts the next morning to keep up the daily post record – if you see a post dated anytime within ten minutes to midnight, that's a pretty good clue that it's a backdated post) but rarely more than that in a row.  Even during holidays or when I'm mostly away from a computer for other reasons, I tend to find Internet access or pre-post a few entries in advance or whatever. 

Shea had a family reunion this weekend and I wasn't sure whether I'd post or not but in the end, I decided to let it slide for the weekend.  This is partly because my new iPhone only had spotty coverage at the regional park where we were camping (literally, I would get no service standing by the camper then walk back fifty feet to the firepit and get a bar and a half…sometimes.)  That was enough to check e-mail and do a Facebook update here and there but that was about it.  Add in the fact that I can post to my blog from the iPhone but that I can't access all of the blog's editing tools, only the very basic ones, made me say “Ah, we'll just let it slide for a couple days.”

For example, here's one of the photos I sent to Facebook of Pace “driving” his Grandpa's new 1970 dune buggy on the knee of his Uncle Marsh… 


I have to admit that blogging's felt like a bit of a burden lately too – I think this is partly because I felt so inspired writing about Ryan Meili's campign for the leadership of the Sask NDP that the comedown afterwards was bigger than I expected.  Writing about libraries, technology and other topics that catch my attention is still fun but maybe not as meaningful as my political blogging? 

I don't know – I'm sure I've gone through lulls before (hell, my third post ever on this blog is titled “Day Three and Already Nothing to Write About“) and on that note, I'm heading for three and a half years as a blogger (hard to believe) so maybe that's part of the restlessness I feel?  I have a couple ideas floating around – I've joked about adding more of those semi-easy recurring features like my “Friday Fun Link” and my “Music Monday” things – I was thinking of doing a “picture of the day” now that I've got the iPhone and have a camera with me pretty much 24/7.  I've also been tossing around the idea of moving to a new server and converting to WordPress.  Finally, I've also been thinking of changing the focus of my online energies to more life streaming (which is what a lot of us online are already doing to varying degrees with our Twitter tweets and our Flickr photos posts and our Last.fm music scrobbles and so on…) 

I don't know – maybe I'm just burned out from a weekend of fun in the sun and lots of visiting and lots of chasing kids around a campfire and lots of beer and so on.  Hoepfully I'll recoup a bit in the next day or two and get the fire back (er, as much as anything about libraries can get you fired up.  Well, actually maybe it can!  Thanks to DJ for the link on Facebook!) 

Head Tale Blog – Mobile Version

Amazing what getting a mobile phone will do in terms of making your realise that your blog is quite, uhm…heavy…with all kinds of marginally useful widgets, random links and assorted other junk. 

Luckily, there's a really easy way to use Google Reader to create a poor man's mobile version of your blog.

Just bookmark the following URL on your mobile and you'll have the condensed Head Tale ready to go whenever you want (the trick works for any blog/site with an RSS feed – just append the site's feed address to the end of this link):

http://www.google.com/reader/m/view/feed/https://headtale.com/blog/index.xml


(tip found at: http://www.labnol.org/internet/design/how-to-create-mobile-phone-optimized-blog/2132/)

Who's Gonna Save Me? Ten Songs I Could Put On Repeat and Listen to Non-Stop

We all have those songs that are so catchy or that have great lyrics or that we connect with so strongly for other reasons that we could put them on repeat on our music players and just listen to them over and over (in the old days, this same effect was accomplished by taping the same song over and over onto a blank cassette.  If your Walkman had auto-reverse, you were golden!) 

That 80's theme is somewhat appropriate as this list was inspired by my recent re-discovery of song #10 on the list…which I listened to repeatedly in the car tonight while driving to (and home from) a meeting.

10. “Blue Sky Mine” – Midnight Oil – okay, I looked – the song's from 1990 so technically not an 80's theme like I just said.  But Midnight Oil is definitely an 80's band in my mind.
9. “In the Air Tonight” – Phil Collins – admit it, you did the repeat-play thing with this song in grade six too.
8. “Copperhead Road” – Steve Earle
7. “Linda Put the Coffee On” – Ray Materick
6. “Song 2” – Blur (at least when it first came out, I did the repeat play thing – at a house party no less.  Don't know if I'd still play it repeatedly today.) 
5. “America” – Paul Simon
4. “And Your Bird Can Sing” – Beatles (yes, out of the entire Beatles catalogue, this is the one I go with!)
3. “Wake Up Boo!” – Boo Radleys
2. “Fairytale of New York” – Pogues (not just at Christmas either although that's obviously the ideal time for it)
1.  “Find The River” – REM

Cory Doctorow on Copyright

Because Cory Doctorow's new novel, “Little Brother” is the first e-book I'm reading on my iPhone (very readable, thank-you very much), I got to see his copyright notice which I'm reproducing here in its entirety because it's such a great summary of how copyright should work in a sane and rational world:

THE
COPYRIGHT THING

The
Creative Commons license at the top of this file probably tipped you
off to the fact that I've got some pretty unorthodox views about
copyright. Here's what I think of it, in a nutshell: a little goes a
long way, and more than that is too much.

I
like the fact that copyright lets me sell rights to my publishers and
film studios and so on. It's nice that they can't just take my stuff
without permission and get rich on it without cutting me in for a
piece of the action. I'm in a pretty good position when it comes to
negotiating with these companies: I've got a great agent and a
decade's experience with copyright law and licensing (including a
stint as a delegate at WIPO, the UN agency that makes the world's
copyright treaties). What's more, there's just not that many of these
negotiations — even if I sell fifty or a hundred different editions
of Little Brother (which would put it in top millionth of a
percentile for fiction), that's still only a hundred negotiations,
which I could just about manage.

I
hate
the fact that fans who want to do what readers have always done are
expected to play in the same system as all these hotshot agents and
lawyers. It's just stupid
to say that an elementary school classroom should have to talk to a
lawyer at a giant global publisher before they put on a play based on
one of my books. It's ridiculous to say that people who want to
“loan” their electronic copy of my book to a friend need to
get a license
to do so. Loaning books has been around longer than any publisher on
Earth, and it's a fine thing.

I
recently saw Neil Gaiman give a talk at which someone asked him how
he felt about piracy of his books. He said, “Hands up in the
audience if you discovered your favorite writer for free — because
someone loaned you a copy, or because someone gave it to you? Now,
hands up if you found your favorite writer by walking into a store
and plunking down cash.” Overwhelmingly, the audience said that
they'd discovered their favorite writers for free, on a loan or as a
gift. When it comes to my favorite writers, there's no boundaries:
I'll buy every book they publish, just to own it (sometimes I buy two
or three, to give away to friends who must
read those books). I pay to see them live. I buy t-shirts with their
book-covers on them. I'm a customer for life.

Neil
went on to say that he was part of the tribe of readers, the tiny
minority of people in the world who read for pleasure, buying books
because they love them. One thing he knows about everyone who
downloads his books on the Internet without permission is that
they're readers,
they're people who love books.

People
who study the habits of music-buyers have discovered something
curious: the biggest pirates are also the biggest spenders. If you
pirate music all night long, chances are you're one of the few people
left who also goes to the record store (remember those?) during the
day. You probably go to concerts on the weekend, and you probably
check music out of the library too. If you're a member of the red-hot
music-fan tribe, you do lots of everything
that has to do with music, from singing in the shower to paying for
black-market vinyl bootlegs of rare Eastern European covers of your
favorite death-metal band.

Same
with books. I've worked in new bookstores, used bookstores and
libraries. I've hung out in pirate ebook (“bookwarez”)
places online. I'm a stone used bookstore junkie, and I go to book
fairs for fun. And you know what? It's the same people at all those
places: book fans who do lots of everything that has to do with
books. I buy weird, fugly pirate editions of my favorite books in
China because they're weird and fugly and look great next to the
eight or nine other editions that I paid full-freight for of the same
books. I check books out of the library, google them when I need a
quote, carry dozens around on my phone and hundreds on my laptop, and
have (at this writing) more than 10,000 of them in storage lockers in
London, Los Angeles and Toronto.

If
I could loan out my physical books without giving up possession of
them, I would.
The fact that I can do so with digital files is not a bug, it's a
feature, and a damned fine one. It's embarrassing to see all these
writers and musicians and artists bemoaning the fact that art just
got this wicked new feature: the ability to be shared without losing
access to it in the first place. It's like watching restaurant owners
crying down their shirts about the new free lunch machine that's
feeding the world's starving people because it'll force them to
reconsider their business-models. Yes, that's gonna be tricky, but
let's not lose sight of the main attraction: free lunches!

Universal
access to human knowledge is in our grasp, for the first time in the
history of the world. This is not a bad thing.

In
case that's not enough for you, here's my pitch on why giving away
ebooks makes sense at this time and place:

Giving
away ebooks gives me artistic, moral and commercial satisfaction. The
commercial question is the one that comes up most often: how can you
give away free ebooks and still make money?

For
me — for pretty much every writer — the big problem isn't piracy,
it's obscurity (thanks to Tim O'Reilly for this great aphorism). Of
all the people who failed to buy this book today, the majority did so
because they never heard of it, not because someone gave them a free
copy. Mega-hit best-sellers in science fiction sell half a million
copies — in a world where 175,000 attend the San Diego Comic Con
alone, you've got to figure that most of the people who “like
science fiction” (and related geeky stuff like comics, games,
Linux, and so on) just don't really buy books. I'm more interested in
getting more of that wider audience into the tent than making sure
that everyone who's in the tent bought a ticket to be there.

Ebooks
are verbs, not nouns. You copy them, it's in their nature. And many
of those copies have a destination, a person they're intended for, a
hand-wrought transfer from one person to another, embodying a
personal recommendation between two people who trust each other
enough to share bits. That's the kind of thing that authors (should)
dream of, the proverbial sealing of the deal. By making my books
available for free pass-along, I make it easy for people who love
them to help other people love them.

What's
more, I don't see ebooks as substitute for paper books for most
people. It's not that the screens aren't good enough, either: if
you're anything like me, you already spend every hour you can get in
front of the screen, reading text. But the more computer-literate you
are, the less likely you are to be reading long-form works on those
screens — that's because computer-literate people do more things
with their computers. We run IM and email and we use the browser in a
million diverse ways. We have games running in the background, and
endless opportunities to tinker with our music libraries. The more
you do with your computer, the more likely it is that you'll be
interrupted after five to seven minutes to do something else. That
makes the computer extremely poorly suited to reading long-form works
off of, unless you have the iron self-discipline of a monk.

The
good news (for writers) is that this means that ebooks on computers
are more likely to be an enticement to buy the printed book (which
is, after all, cheap, easily had, and easy to use) than a substitute
for it. You can probably read just enough of the book off the screen
to realize you want to be reading it on paper.

So
ebooks sell print books. Every writer I've heard of who's tried
giving away ebooks to promote paper books has come back to do it
again. That's the commercial case for doing free ebooks.

Now,
onto the artistic case. It's the twenty-first century. Copying stuff
is never, ever going to get any harder than it is today (or if it
does, it'll be because civilization has collapsed, at which point
we'll have other problems). Hard drives aren't going to get bulkier,
more expensive, or less capacious. Networks won't get slower or
harder to access. If you're not making art with the intention of
having it copied, you're not really making art for the twenty-first
century. There's something charming about making work you don't want
to be copied, in the same way that it's nice to go to a Pioneer
Village and see the olde-timey blacksmith shoeing a horse at his
traditional forge. But it's hardly, you know, contemporary.
I'm a science fiction writer. It's my job to write about the future
(on a good day) or at least the present. Art that's not supposed to
be copied is from the past.

Finally,
let's look at the moral case. Copying stuff is natural. It's how we
learn (copying our parents and the people around us). My first story,
written when I was six, was an excited re-telling of Star Wars, which
I'd just seen in the theater. Now that the Internet — the world's
most efficient copying machine — is pretty much everywhere, our
copying instinct is just going to play out more and more. There's no
way I can stop my readers, and if I tried, I'd be a hypocrite: when I
was 17, I was making mix-tapes, photocopying stories, and generally
copying in every way I could imagine. If the Internet had been around
then, I'd have been using it to copy as much as I possibly could.

There's
no way to stop it, and the people who try end up doing more harm than
piracy ever did. The record industry's ridiculous holy war against
file-sharers (more than 20,000 music fans sued and counting!)
exemplifies the absurdity of trying to get the food-coloring out of
the swimming pool. If the choice is between allowing copying or being
a frothing bully lashing out at anything he can reach, I choose the
former.