800 People on the Waiting List for “Fifty Shades of Grey” at Saskatchewan Libraries

Digital Strategy Catches Up With the Present: An Interview with The Smithsonian’s Michael Edson

Lots to think about in this interview and presentation…

Some choice quotes…

We don’t have to wait to see if social media and crowdsourcing and mobile data in the cloud are going to add up to anything useful. It’s happened. These things are real, now today….We need to change our collective mindset from “let’s be cautious and wait to see how things are going to turn out before we commit” to “Let’s place the bet. Let’s get it done.”

An interesting thought experiment to analyse your system…

The basic idea of the Extraterrestrial Space Auditor is to put yourself in the mindset of an auditor from outer space—from way out of town, so to speak—with no bias or assumptions about your organization’s prestige or presumed value in society. The extraterrestrial Space Auditor’s only job is to look at your organization and compare its stated mission with what you are actually doing every day: how you’re spending your time, investing resources, hiring, firing, the kinds of meetings you’re having, the pace and velocity in the organization—the outcomes you’re achieving in society.

And a very succinct insight into why things don’t always progress as quickly as we might like…

The biggest obstacle to “Organization 2.0” is Organization 1.0.

Music Monday – “Thou shall not judge a book by its cover/Thou shall not judge Lethal Weapon by Danny Glover”

Knock Knock. Who’s There? Rape? Rape Who? Rape Jokes – Are They Funny?

About a month ago, there was a minor uproar online after a female patron at a comedy show posted of an extremely unsettling experience her and her friend had on a Tumblr blog.

The two women decided to go to a show featuring well-known comic Dane Cook (who they’d heard of) with Daniel Tosh (who they hadn’t heard of) opening.  During Tosh’s set, he made the claim that all rape jokes are funny and, offended, this patron stood up and rebutted, saying that rape jokes are never funny.  Tosh responded by saying “Wouldn’t it be funny if that woman got raped?  Like right now?  By like five guys? Right now?”

The woman and her friend made a hasty exit, fearing for their safety (or according to one account, talking to the manager and getting comp tickets to a show on a different night.)  The story was posted and has produced lots of feedback which continues to reverberate around the world to this day.

Here are some of my thoughts…

  • The first thing to remember is though the woman’s version has got the most attention and Tosh’s only response was a backhanded apology on Twitter, the exact details of the incident are disputed.
  • Even if I’m only going by the version of events posted to Tumblr, I’ll start by saying I am a huge believer in freedom of expression and as part of that, I don’t think there is *any* subject that should be offside for jokes – not the Holocaust, not abortion, not religion, politics or yes, rape.
  • Another issue is that comedy is often described as “tragedy plus time” so some point out that the big difference between jokes about the Holcaust (well, the Nazi one anyhow) and rape is that rape is ongoing and widespread issue in our society.
  • So do I believe all rape jokes are funny?  Of course not – it depends on the situation, the comedian, the premise of the joke and a bazillion other factors.  George Carlin can do rape jokes.  Daniel Tosh – well, his fans think he’s funny but in terms of his ability to handle this type of material (who knows – maybe even thinking he’s evoking Carlin?), maybe not so much.  [Edit: er, definitely not so much]
  • This will sound like “blame the victim” which is dangerous when discussing rape but honestly, the woman admits in her Tumblr piece that she doesn’t normally go to comedy shows, that she had no idea who Tosh was or what type of material he did and that she heckled him (and yes, there’s also lot of debate about whether what she did was “heckling” but in my mind, saying *anything* out loud at a comedy show other than laughing or saying “right on!” will likely be considered heckling and maybe even saying “right on!”  Hell, I’ve seen people heckled at comedy shows for coming in late, for sitting in the front row, for what they’re wearing.  So verbally challenging a comedian?  Definitely heckling and this woman got what any other heckler would get from pretty much any comedian who has their show interrupted – no matter the topic or the type of interruption.)  [Edit: some versions of the story say that Tosh asked the audience “so what do you want to talk about?” and a guy in the front row said “rape” so the woman adding her response, after comments being solicited, means it wasn’t heckling.  Except I don’t buy that because Tosh didn’t say “What *don’t* you want to talk about?”]
  • I don’t know if it’s a good analogy but when I went to an Edmonton Oilers game wearing a Calgary Flames jersey and got called a loser, an idiot, mentally retarded, etc.  To me, that’s part of the deal in that circumstance – as long as it doesn’t cross to violence, intimidation or assault (eg. drunk fans often pour beers or get in the faces of fans of other teams.)  Maybe that’s where the analogy falls apart – I knew what I was inviting with my provocative choice of dress, this woman maybe didn’t realise what the typical reaction to *any* heckling at a comedy show is?  (I mean, when she spoke up, did she expect Tosh to stop the show and chat with her about gender politics?  Apologise on the spot?  Break down in tears for his misguided career path?)  [Edit: others have made analogies that, although also not perfect, probably do a much better job of pointing out why her speaking up wasn’t appropriate, no matter how she felt about what Tosh said.)
  • A lot of commentary looks at how Tosh’s response made the woman the victim and a target for a majority culture (presumably a club filled with a bunch of men, many who would have been drinking) and that the best comedy – on any subject – comes from making either yourself or the majority culture the butt of the joke.  (I do tend to agree with that.)
  • A stand-up comedian who hosts an open mic on MetaFilter has some interesting thoughts about why comedy clubs often alienate half their audience right off the bat?
  • With all of that said, some comedians are better at handling hecklers than others and no, calling for the gang rape of a woman who heckles probably isn’t the smartest response at the best of times.  I’m reminded of the similar Michael Richards incident which all but ended the former Seinfeld star’s career.
  • Another good point – although the best comedy often seems spontaneous and improvised, in most cases, it’s the results of hours and months of practice, honing and crafting. So to have a comedian’s train-of-though interrupted (comedy is pretty much unique as an entertainment form where audience interruptions are, if not encouraged, tolerated to a certain degree) can be disastrous to the entire performance.  Another strained analogy might be that you’d never see someone go to a theatre production of, I don’t know, does “Rent” have a rape scene?, and yelling out that rape is wrong and shouldn’t be glorified by the actors!
  • Pop quiz: is this a funny rape joke?

I’ll end my ramble with this quote from one of the articles linked above:

It is every good comic’s job to make us laugh while at the same time getting us to think about the world—including aspects of our world that are utterly horrific.

Of course the operative part of that sentence is every good comic’s job and for me, I don’t tend to think of Tosh as a very good comic from what I’ve seen of him.  But, like I defend all kinds of literature that I don’t agree with – that my public library has books by late-night infomerical spirituality and fad diet hawkers, climate change deniers and all kinds of other crap that I think is stupid, Daniel Tosh is also part of that wide swath of what makes up our popular culture – from the absolute crap the absolute genius.

[Edit: Unfortunately, rape is in the news today in a way that’s not funny at all. Well, unless this comment causes this douchebag to lose the election in which case that would be fucking hilarious!]

Saturday Snap – Warning Signs (Or Just A Cool Wife?)

Shea had this grocery list left on the counter in advance of a BBQ we were having last night.  The best explanation for the repeated item came from a co-worker who said said she was probably reminding herself to buy red AND white wine!

Friday Fun Link – Legal Decisions Are Fun!

I’ve made a few passing references to the fact that I am no longer the Organization Development Specialist at Regina Public Library.

Without going into specifics, there’s a bit of back story to how that all came about but the main thing to know for the purposes of this post is that when my position was eliminated last fall, our union filed an Unfair Labour Practice claim against RPL management regarding some of the circumstances surrounding how my position was being eliminated.

Soon after, RPL filed an unfair labour practice claim of their own against the local that an advocacy web site the union had launched as part of our prolonged contract negotiations, check-us-out.net (now in hibernation though an archive of the site’s contents will continue to exist on Google and others sites indefinitely) presented false and misleading information.

As a resolution to the two and a half year long contract negotiation finally neared, the union decided to withdraw their unfair labour practice regarding my previous position being eliminated, at least partly as a gesture of good faith.  The employer did not act in a like manner and proceeded with their case.

The case was heard in July and I’m happy to report that the labour board decided in favour of the union.

If wading through a 14 page legal decision isn’t your cup of tea (though I think it makes for a scintillating read!), here are some of the more relevant parts:

Summary of the case…

Section 11(2)(c) – Employer alleges that Union was not bargaining in good faith during recent round of negotiations – Union began public campaign for support which included a “blog” site check-us-out.net – Union published information on website Employer felt was false and misleading and which portrayed a false picture of what the Employer’s position was at the bargaining table – Employer alleges that these postings were intended to interfere with the negotiations for a collective agreement – Board denies application.
Board reviews jurisprudence related to “bargaining in good faith” – applies principles developed in cases involving section 11(1)(c) as provisions sufficiently similar in intent – Board determines that Union was publishing its interpretation of the Employer’s position to its members and the public through the website.

Analysis of the reason the board decided in the union’s favour…

It is not, we submit, unusual for there to be differing points of view during collective bargaining. Each side will want to “spin” their perspective of the events in bargaining to their best advantage in negotiations. The creation of the website by the Union was one of the vehicles utilized to provide the “spin” on proposals and the state of negotiations. Additionally, the website was a part of their public campaign to gain support for their position with the general public and so as to put pressure on the Library Board to make changes to their position.

Further analysis…

Viewed objectively, we are satisfied that the Union presented its version of the Employer’s proposals on its website. That version was clearly one with which the Employer did not agree, and in respect of which, on many occasions it attempted to explain to the Union in bargaining. While the Union’s view as presented on the website may have been self interested, may have been a “spin” of the Employer’s position, and may have impacted on the Employer’s position at the bargaining table such that it finally withdrew its offered definition of “Permanent Employee” and added wording to Articles 30 and 33 to better define the impact of those proposals, it is not conduct which the Board finds censorable under s. 11(2)(c).

Lastly…

The Employer says that the Union perverted its intent while the Union says that it followed the black and white text of the Employer’s proposals. Taking a reasonable view of the postings on the website and the wording of the actual proposals and their impact, the postings by the Union were sufficiently accurate from its perspective to not cross the line

Reading this decision, I am reminded of the analysis by the noted philosopher and legal scholar, Nelson Muntz, in the decision Ha vs. Ha. 😉

(And you can be sure that type of legal representation doesn’t come cheap!)

With This Ring, I Thee Click?

A colleague sent me this article about a new augmented reality device – a ring with an embedded camera that can snap photos of objects then send that photo to a smartphone which can, in turn, analyse and provide feedback about what is being seen – colours, prices, etc.

This hits two areas of interest for me – given my current position, services for the visually impaired but also my longtime interest in wearable computers.

Pretty cool!

New Regent Place Branch Opens at Regina Public Library

Within a decade, RPL has gone from plans to close three branches plus two specialized units to opening two new branches within the last year and plans to hopefully build a new Central Library eventually.

The latest branch opening was the new Regent Place location which happens to be the one closest to my home and my home branch before I began working at RPL’s current Central Library.

I stopped by yesterday on my way home to have a look at the new digs and was pretty impressed (and although I had no formal role in the move or at the opening, even ended up helping a patron with a computer question!)

At the same time, it’s unfortunate, given our recent extended contract negotiation and various other happenings at RPL in the last few years that there’s not more of a sense of excitement among staff for these achievements – a real lost opportunity if you ask me.

20120816-153402.jpg

20120816-153435.jpg

20120816-153442.jpg

Paul Ryan is Romney’s VP Pick

Mitt Romney announced Paul Ryan as his vice-president pick last Friday which led to a flurry of coverage (is it just me or did this announcement come out of nowhere? I thought there was usually more of a build before an announcement like this but maybe I’m just not paying attention.)

At any rate, MetaFilter has a lengthy discussion of the pick which also contains dozens of links analysing every possible aspect of what this pick could mean. But at 755 comments (as I write this), they’re still a long ways off the 5555 comment monstrosity that erupted when Sarah Palin was picked four years ago – still a MeFi record for most comments in a thread I think and almost twice the number of comments submitted for the next longest one.

 

Music Monday – Library Songs

Stumbled across this clip while doing a bit of research on what other Canadian public libraries are doing in terms of their YouTube accounts – are they putting up professionally edited and produced videos or is there a full range with people making homemade, self-edited videos with crappy sound and/or and/or bad lighting and/or comprised of a single shot from a cam on a tripod?  (Answer: the full range is out there but very clearly tending towards the less professional.)

In trying to find the video again for today’s post, I also realised there’s a whole lot of library songs out there!