T-6: Steven Harper’s Advice To His Children May Be The Single Most Tone Deaf Thing I’ve Read During This Election #elxn42 #canpoli

So I’ve been obsessively reading about and following this election through various outlets – Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc. – which often lead to news sites like the CBC, Globe & Mail, National Post.

But occasionally you stumble across something quite different.

For example, Twitter recently led me to what I expected would be a typical puff piece interview with Steven Harper in “Today’s Parent” magazine.

Maybe it was that venue, not really known for hard-hitting news coverage, which made me let my guard down.

But reading Mr. Harper’s replies to the magazine’s questions, two of his answers struck me as so hypocritical and offensive, I couldn’t believe the absolute tone deafness of his answers, especially when compared with his actual, demonstrated actions.

First, from the man who made the niqab into a divisive, racism-tinged wedge issue in this election…

THE BEHAVIOUR HE ENCOURAGES [IN HIS KIDS]: “To me, the most important thing is respect for other people. I always say to the kids, “You don’t have to like everyone, you don’t have to be friends with everyone, but you don’t pick on people. You don’t single people out because they’re different. And if that goes on, you call it—you stand up against it. It’s not how we conduct our lives. You don’t build yourself up by belittling others.” Our kids, I think, have got that message.”

And from the man whose party has been caught cheating in each of the last three elections they’ve won…

THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING FAIR: “I tell my kids, particularly my son, who likes to compete and to win: ‘You’ve got to be fair. You don’t win by cheating; you win fair. Respect rules, be honest, apply yourself when you’re in an activity. Make a decision later, and don’t quit in the middle.’”

T-7: “It’s the Economy, Stupid.” #elxn42 #canpoli

via Broadbent Institute

Originally coined by Bill Clinton advisor, James Carville, the phrase “It’s the economy, stupid” has become a useful shorthand for what many elections are really about no matter how much politicians try to focus voters on other meaningless distractions.

This holds true in the current Canadian election where surveys have shown that 60% of people feel that the economy is the single most important issue.  And if you figure in that “jobs” comes in at 20%, that means up to 80% of Canadians feel that some aspect of our economy is the most important issue in this election.

So let’s take a look at some of the…

Facts About The Canadian Economy Under Steven Harper

Conservatives tend to be perceived as best party for the economy but, as much as it pains me to say, the Liberals actually have a *way* better track record than the Conservatives in managing the economy in good times and bad.

Beyond that, the fact is that the NDP actually have the most fiscally responsible record of any governing party in Canadian history – a huge surprise to most people who buy into the idea of “tax and spend socialists”.  But the reality is, going back to Tommy Douglas, the NDP realised the banks and corporate sector were not allies for their ambitious plans to improve the lives of everyday workers.  So by keeping the books balanced, they stood the best chance of getting things done (not to mention the benefit of not paying a bunch of money in interest.)

T-8: A Few Thoughts on Trudeau’s “Real Change” Campaign #elxn42 #canpoli

I find it fascinating that Justin Trudeau has run on a slogan of “Real Change” when there are a few very clear signs that he’s not either of those things…

But even though he’s not the biggest “change” option in this election which is all about change, there’s still a chance that Trudeau could end up winning.  Why?

I ran into the same issue during the last Sask NDP leadership race – I volunteered on the campaign of Dr. Ryan Meili who was the candidate who I felt represented the most change for the party after the disastrous leadership of Dwain Lingenfelter.  And, just like in that race, people said they were clamouring for a big change but ended up electing Cam Broten, someone who was a lot more familiar and comfortable.

What I said at that time about the difficulty of representing the most change in any election applies to the contrast between Justin Trudeau’s false promise of “Real Change” and Tom Mulcair’s actual change in this election as well…

You’re probably reading this and thinking I’m dismissing the other three and holding up Ryan as some perfect choice for the party. In a weird way, I think it may be the opposite.

In my view, Ryan’s the right choice. But he’s got probably the biggest hurdle in front of him to make this case to others who will be voting for leader. Even with the debacle of the last provincial election, studies have repeatedly shown that people are naturally resistant to major change – even when they should know better – and this leadership race could end up being another example of that.

Being a *true* change candidate – being completely different not only in policy and approach from the current governing party instead of just in a few ways – isn’t an easy mantle to wear, even in a “change” election.

One week from now we’ll see if Tom Mulcair has convinced Canadians that he, more than Justin Trudeau, represents real change from the Steven Harper era.

T-9: Combatting the Cynicism of Politics #elxn42 #canpoli

There’s a lot of commonly accepted wisdom you hear that reflect the increasing amount of cynicism that people have towards the political process…

They’re all the same.
There are definitely good and bad people involved in all parties.  But saying that all politicians are bad simply because they’re politicians is as simplistic (and wrong!) as saying “all teachers are the same” or “All doctors are the same” or whatever.

My Vote Doesn’t Matter
Even if you’re in a riding where your preferred party isn’t likely to win or you vote for a fringe party, it’s still important to vote.  Beyond that old line about “You can’t complain if you don’t vote” (which many people agree with but I’m not a particular fan of since I think everyone has the right to complain no matter what!), there’s the reality that, in recent elections where turnout usually hovers around 60% and is split between 3+ parties, there’s not a single election where 100% turnout couldn’t have changed the results of the election.  I think I read somewhere that any party that gets over 10% of the vote (?) in a riding also gets a refund on a portion their eligible election expenses so even if you live in the heart of Tory Alberta and vote NDP or Liberal, you’re helping the democratic process by ensuring those parties get some money back for their efforts.

I Don’t Have Time
There are people whose personal circumstances do make it more of an effort to get to the polls – a single mom with three kids, someone without transportation, or whatever. But a federal election happens only once every four years or so.  And since this is the longest election campaign in history, there’s been plenty of time to make arrangements to get to the polls.  Most parties also have “get out the vote” (GOTV) efforts on election day where volunteers will offer rides to the polls or help facilitate the process for you in any way that they can.  As my grade seven teacher used to say when someone said they didn’t have time to get their homework done, “You didn’t have the time or you didn’t *make* the time?”

The Government Sucks/They Don’t Do Anything For Me Anyhow
General cynicism about politics can lead to increased cynicism about the important role of goverment.  This is even helped along (hopefully unintentionally) by the media, which should have a role in impartially covering the issues but end up creating cynicism by covering politics and elections like they were horse races or sporting events.  Even political parties can contribute the cynicism with their attempts to discourage certain groups that are unlikely to vote for them from participating or just by giving the impression that they don’t listen to the public.

But ultimately, you don’t have to agree with everything the government does (I don’t like high military spending for instance) to still recognize that part of your social contract as a citizen of our society is that by pooling our resources, via the government, everyone gets to share in the many important services that the private sector can’t or won’t provide as effectively – healthcare, highways, economic policy and about a zillion other things that we all benefit from. If you try to take a larger view and not be cynical about things that only affect you but keep a focus on how our society is doing overall, you can approach these issues in a less cynical fashion.

T-10: Talking Turkey: Will Thanksgiving Weekend Decide The Election? #elxn42 #canpoli

Maclean’s has an article about how long weekends (especially ones that fall very close to an election) are vital times in campaigns as that’s when family gather and talk together over meals and social time.

In fact, from the outset of this unusually gruelling 11-week race, officials for all three of the main parties have, at various times, pointed ahead to Thanksgiving as the most likely time many Canadian voters will make up their minds.

Generally, people don’t want to ruin the festive mood during these occasions so it’s better to focus on the positives of the party you’re supporting rather than the negatives of the party you oppose (ahem, it just came out that THREE Conservative MPs were confirmed in the leaked data from the cheating/affair web site, AshleyMadison.com along with one record that might possibly be a Liberal MP and zero from the NDP.)

Anyhow, with that out of my system, here are some positives about the NDP to highlight when talking your parents and grandparents this weekend…

In the end, I love this quote from Thomas Mulcair which sums up the NDP’s plan perfectly:

“It’s really easy in this election —childcare, healthcare, pharmacare, Mulcair,” to supporters who erupted in cheerful laughter at a campaign stop in Surrey, B.C. on Tuesday.

T-11: NDP Release Their Election Platform (and Three Big Reasons To Vote NDP over the Liberals) #elxn42 #canpoli

The NDP released their election platform today.  Called “Building The Country of Our Dreams” [PDF], it mostly summarizes the various proposals the NDP has been promoting over this entire campaign – affordable daycare, making post-secondary education more affordable, increasing corporate taxes and so on.  (Discussion on Reddit.)

Some highlights identified by a Reddit user:

  • 7,000 more doctors, nurses and nurse practitioners and other health professionals
  • expanding home care to 41,000 more seniors and providing funding for 5,000 more nursing home beds
  • Tripling paid leave available for those too ill to work
  • one million quality childcare spaces at no more than $15 a day
  • extra five weeks of parental leave
  • Cracking down on excessive ATM fees
  • Creating 40,000 jobs, co-op placements and internships for youth
  • reducing the small business tax from 11 to 9%
  • $1.5 billion per year in new infrastructure funding to municipalities to fix roads, bridges and water treatment systems
  • $1.3 billion per year in a national strategy to improve transit and reduce gridlock
  • retrofit over 50,000 homes and apartment buildings
  • returning the retirement age from 67 to 65
  • Restoring home mail delivery
  • hire 2,500 more front-line police officers
  • Investing $454 million to give our veterans support
  • Bolstering food and rail safety regulations
  • repealing Bill C-51
  • bringing in proportional representation for elections
  • Giving the Parliamentary Budget Officer independent authority, and creating a Parliamentary Science Officer

There are many out there who are lumping the NDP & Liberals together (and I’ve been guilty of that on occasion myself) but although there are some similarities (which are especially appealing for those wanting to see Stephen Harper gone), there are some very stark differences between the two parties that people should consider if they’re thinking of voting for one party in place of the other…

  1. Trans-Pacific Partnership
    Along with the Conservatives, the Liberals have indicated their support for this massive international trade deal while the NDP is strongly opposed to the deal which could cause great harm to Canada’s agricultural and automotive sectors as well as causing grave concerns for copyright,  intellectual property rights, and Canada’s ability to write its own laws regarding the Internet as well as Canada’s sovereignty in general (this is the first and probably only time I’ll link to the Green Party in this series of posts!) 😉
  2. C-51
    Even though the Conservatives had a majority position and the Liberals did not need to vote in favour of it, they chose to do what was politically popular at the time and support Bill C-51 which gives much greater surveillance powers to the government.  Officially meant to help prevent terrorism, the bill actually could end up leading to increased government spying on private citizens in violation of our Charter rights.  Rightly, this bill is losing support as more and more Canadians become aware of how it could fundamentally change the nature of our freedoms.
  3. Keystone XL Pipeline
    Again, the Liberals overlap with the Harper Conservatives in saying support this pipeline (just like most Republicans in the US) while the NDP (like most Democrats in the US including Obama and Hillary Clinton) have said very clearly that they oppose it.

Awesome Parkour

Pace thought I should take a break from my election posts to share this awesome parkour video…

T-12: Book ‘Em: Comparing The Leaders’ Books #elxn42 #canpoli

Federal Canadian Leader's Books

A couple posts ago, I included an excerpt from Thomas Mulcair’s autobiography.  As a librarian who previously spent nearly a decade in the Canadian book industry, that made me think it might be fun to compare and contrast some of the details of each leader’s book (full disclosure – I’ve only read Mulcair’s…so far.)

Title Author Publisher Amazon
Pbk 
Price
Pages     Year Amazon Rating
(Total Reviews)
Trivia
 Strength of Conviction  Thomas Mulcair  Dundurn Press $15.00  192  Aug
2015
 4.4 (25) Published by Canada’s largest Canadian-owned publisher
 Common Ground  Justin Trudeau  HarperCollins  $14.43  352  Oct 2014  4.1 (47)  Where do you start? 😉
 Who We Are  Elizabeth May  Greystone Books  $21.95 240  Sept. 2014  4.9 (15)  Arguably the most environmentally conscious publisher on the list.
 A Great Game: The Forgotten
Leafs & The Rise of Professional Hockey 
 Stephen Harper  Simon & Schuster  $17.17  368  Nov 2013  4.2 (30)  The only leader to not have a traditional autobiography/manifesto.
I suspect he’s thinking about his memoirs though!

 

T-13: A Way To *Guarantee* Stephen Harper Loses #elxn42 #canpoli

Best buds?

A couple years ago in April 2013, soon after the NDP and Liberals had their respective conventions, I blogged about how each party had a strong “cooperation” element within their party – represented in the NDP by Nathan Cullen who took third place in that party’s leadership race and ended up with 25% of the vote.  For the Liberals, it was Joyce Murray who took second place in their leadership race with 10% of the vote in what was otherwise a blowout for Justin Trudeau.

Here’s what I wrote at the time…

Since 1993, Canada has been led by parties who benefited, at least in part, from splits among parties on the opposite end of the political spectrum – the Reform/Conservative split divided resources and focus on the right for three elections (four if you count 2004 when they finally merged) that they may have otherwise been able to win.   Then the split flipped to the “left” (I know the Liberals are more centrist and also, more culturally distinct from the NDP than the Conservatives/Reform were but work with me here) and now the Conservatives have won three elections in a row.

They say the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.  Canadians now have TWENTY years of evidence that splits on one side of the political spectrum ensure that the other side will enjoy long runs in government.

The desire for cooperation between the Liberals & NDP is still popular with over half of Canadian voters.

On that note, I recently came across an article which proposes a limited form of cooperation – if the Liberals pull out of eight ridings where the NDP is the main challenge to the Conservatives and the NDP do the same in eight ridings where the Liberals are the main challenger – that would greatly increase the odds of the Conservatives losing up to 16 more seats while the Liberals and NDP would each stand to win an equal number and the popular vote would (roughly) balance out.

Of course, anything can happen and this wouldn’t be guaranteed to work exactly as outlined.  But if each party’s true goal is to get Stephen Harper out of power and if the projections look like the NDP and Liberals are going to end up working together anyhow if we end up with a minority Conservative government, why not take the opportunity to make sure the Conservatives finish third instead of (barely) first?

Again, this is probably something that would have worked better if it was arranged before the candidates were picked in these ridings and invested this much in the campaign (like back in April 2013 or so?)

Beyond that, I think both parties still see too much light between themselves and the other party to work together in such a concerted fashion.  Plus, even if they did, there’s a chance it could backfire if Canadians saw this as too much “tilting the table” even if it would be perfectly legal (I got enough pushback on Facebook when I talked about vote swapping – which is also completely legal.)

Anyhow, as strong of an NDP supporter as I am, I would be very happy to see some type of arrangement as early as possible because I think the country is too important to risk even the slim chance of Harper getting another majority (with two weeks left, who knows what tricks he has up his sleeve?)

T-14: Red Door, Blue Door. Time To Open the Orange Window! #elxn42 #canpoli

Short History of Canadian Politics

I saw the above graphic on Reddit and it struck home.

The short term memory of Canadian voters always astounds me – many ridings across Canada will elect Liberals to defeat Conservatives, having apparently forgotten that only a short decade ago, the Liberals were the party that was seen as tired, out-dated and corrupt, much like the Conservatives are seen today.

The NDP has never had a chance to govern at the federal level and that’s one of their greatest appeals to me.  I’m very interested to see what they could do if given the opportunity to break the revolving “red door/blue door” cycle of the last 100+ years of Canadian politics.

Thomas Mulcair makes the point very well in his autobiography, “Strength of Conviction” when he talks about one example – how both parties have failed, repeatedly for over thirty years, to implement a national childcare strategy…

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at TueOctober 6, 2015 9.39 PM

Red door?  Blue door?  On October 19, let’s hope voters open a new orange window!