FTRW 2013 – Day 3 – #ftrweek – “If this mother-fucking stupid fucking song/Offended you/With its filthy fucking language/And fucking disrespect”

Every year during FTRW, I usually like to post one (potentially) offensive song (eg. a song with lots of swearing or controversial lyrics or whatever) because it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. šŸ˜‰

Sometimes these songsĀ use swearing to make a point about censorship, sometimes they use swearing for humourous effectĀ and sometimes the song I pick pretty much hasĀ no obvious redeeming valueĀ (seriously, what is the value of that song? Ā “Artistic” expression? Ā Release of anger? Some weird form of self-directed psychotherapy?)

This year’s song indirectly references censorship and is very humourous but it also (at least in my mind) has a huge amount of social value with Ā its quite brilliant commentary about theĀ blind eye society turns towards some of the most blatant evils of religion and specifically, the Pope.

From the latter link…

Curse words are bad because they make some people feel momentarily uncomfortable. Child rape is bad because it causes physical harm and psychological trauma, often for a lifetime, a lifetime that may be cut short because of the aforementioned psychological trauma. Covering up child rape is bad because it allows child rape to continue. And, of course, claiming to be in a position to decide what is and isn’t good, while covering up child rape, is the height of hypocrisy.

There is no way Minchin’s song is in any way comparable to what the Catholic church has done. And if you’re not angry enough at the church to swear, then what’s wrong with you?

All those bad words – won’t someone think of the innocent children?

Yes, indeedĀ –Ā won’t someone think of the innocentĀ children!

 

FTRW 2013 – Day 2 – #ftrweek – Freedom of Expression, Censorship & #skndpldr

Given the hash tags I’m using for this post, I suspect there are going to be a couple different audiences for this post – those who are interested in content related to Freedom to Read Week and those who’ve seen the writing I’ve done as Social Media Director for one of the candidates in the current race for the new leader of the Saskatchewan NDP.

Since the majority of my political writing has come on Mondays, I was trying to think of a way that I could combine Freedom of Expression and the current Sask NDP leadership race into a single post today. After all, what is more core to the idea of democracy than people’s ability to express their ideas openly?

I couldn’t come up with a single overriding theme for a post so instead, I thought I’d do quick hits on a few different topics where the two subjects intersect.

Before I begin, I’m sure everybody reading this is aware but Freedom to Read Week is an annual, week-long celebration, coordinated by the Book & Periodical Council of Canada where writers, publishers, educators, librarians, lawyers, civil rights activists, book sellers and others celebrate people’s freedom to read what they want without fear of censorship.

The name “Freedom to Read” is a bit of a misnomer as the week is about more than books – it encompasses art, movies, music, web sites and various other forms of communication. So, at least for most people, the week is about exposing all types of censorship and defending all forms of expression.
So how does that relate to the current Sask NDP leadership race? I’m glad you asked…

Trolls
I’ve already shared some of my thoughts about trolls in an earlier post. As the race draws to a close, we’ve seen another jump in the number of people who are coming to Ryan’s Facebook page and other forums leaving gratuitous comments that aren’t an attempt to engage or debate but simply to, well, shit on things.

I took a fairly firm stand when this issue first came up in the first half of the race. There were some on Ryan’s campaign who felt that the trolls were most easily dealt with by deleting their comments and moving on (and in some ways, they’re right.) One person on the campaign said to me: “Is there an Internet law against deleting comments?” No, of course not, but it gets back to the type of campaign that I hoped we were trying to represent and the type of leader Ryan was going to be – one who was open and tolerant of all views, even ones he didn’t agree with. And part of that is leaving these types of angry/hateful/inane comments see the light of day rather than hiding them in the dark.

Beyond that, it’s a real slippery slope from deleting (censoring?) ones that say “Fuck the NDP!” to deleting poorly written ones that just happen to express a different point of view to deleting all dissenting points of view. It’s easy to say “oh, we’d never do that” but that also begs the question of whose it is that to decide which is which?

My view, which I think we’ve adhered to for the most part, is to let these comments stand and let their lack of…insight/logic/generally accepted standards for spelling…be their own downfall. (A recent favourite: “GTFO Connies!” where the poster meant “Commies”. In fact, I’m thinking of having a “GTFO Connie!” shirt made for convention!)

Anyhow, I’m not pure and selfless either – I’ve deleted enough of these comments myself – although I hope usually when they’re veering into hate language (which *is* illegal and an easy place to draw the line.)

“Preventative” Censorship
Another post I did during the leadership race compared the view counts for the most recent videos from all four candidates. At the time, I hadn’t noticed this but re-watching one (and then all) of them, I realised that Ryan was the only one who had left comments enabled for his video.Ā  Now, I know YouTube comments are widely regarded as some of the worst on the web. And there’s also a question of capacity – campaigns probably don’t want to be spending all their time deleting/responding to “Suck it Connies!” comments.Ā  But again, these types of micro-decisions say a lot about the macro approach of the candidates involved – who is a fan of openness and transparency and, when you get right down to it, who defends democracy – even when it’s ugly. (YouTube comments as the embodiment of democracy? You heard it here first!)

Self-Censorship
This comes in a couple different forms. I think it comes on a personal level where volunteers censor what they say or do in the interest of the greater good of getting their candidate elected. I know for myself, as part of the “positive” campaign, I’ve restrained myself from giving the full expression of my opinions about matters of one kind or another (note how my Halfway Recap cites Memorable and Appreciated Moments for each campaign but not “Moment Candidate Acted Like An Idiot”.) šŸ˜‰ Of course, that can also be a good thing – I’ve probably avoided putting my foot in my mouth with ranty-pants posts numerous times because of Ryan’s positive approach which has rubbed off on me and his other volunteers.

Speaking of Ryan, the other form is the self-censorship that I think the candidates probably all engage in to differing degrees – from not saying exactly what they think about certain topics, policies and people to trying to spin and homogenize their messages so they appeal to the broadest swath of the electorate or avoid saying/doing anything which carries any potential risk of blowback against them. (My own take on that is once you worry too much about what your opponent will use against you, you’ve already lost.)

I understand it’s all part of the game. But call me idealistic, I still think the electorate would respect someone who speaks honestly without resorting to non-statements and equivocation like so many “professional” politicians tend to do.

Facebook Friend “Censorship
Okay, this probably doesn’t meet the “censorship” test. But this is as good of place as any to mention that I think it’s really bad form when one of the four leadership candidates de-friends you on Facebook after having accepted your Friend Request at the start of the campaign, for, as far as I can tell, no good reason. Again, actions like this give a lot of insight into the leadership styles that certain people may engage in, no matter how much their leadership statements may say otherwise about their being inclusive and team-oriented! šŸ˜‰

FTRW 2013 – Day 1 – #ftrweek – A Word (or Seven) From the Master

As I have on this blog every year since 2007, I’m planning a week-long series of posts relating to the unofficial Haunakah (er, or week-long holiday of your choice) forĀ librarians everywhere – Freedom to Read Week!

Tune in for the rest of the week for seven crazy nights of fun!

To start it off, let’s hear from the man who defines Freedom to Read Week for me in so many ways…

Saturday Snap – Princess Kate Is On Her Way!

Had a busy day as Shea’s and my parents were in to spend a day doing various things to help us get ready for the arrival of “Princess Kate” (as our baby girl has been christened by Grandpa Dennis, the only one to successfully guess “girl” during our Baby Reveal on Christmas Eve.)

Grandma Joan showing off the baby’s newly painted room…

20130223-215547.jpg
Jason and his mom showing off an IKEA dresser (perhaps the single most swear-filled project of the day!)…

20130223-215610.jpg
Papa Dennis and Papa Ray installed a new vanity (that’s not a typical “new baby” home improvement. Ā But since we were doing so many other projects, it was a good excuse to get rid of our original one that I always thought looked like something from a 1970s porn film. Uhm, not that I would know what a 1970s porn film looks like!) šŸ˜‰

20130223-215716.jpg

Papa Ray re-hanging the curtains after the painting is done…

20130223-215742.jpg

The proud parents survey the baby’s new room…

20130223-221021.jpg

 

We finished the day at Teppanyaki Japanese Steak House for a thank-you for your help/triple birthday party (Shea, Janet, Joan). Ā Pace *loved* the “ninja” restaurant with knife-twirling chefs, flaming food and dragon paintings on the wall.

20130223-221037.jpg

Friday Fun Link – 16 Great Library Scenes in Film

I finally realized why I like “The Breakfast Club” so much – the whole movie is set in a library! šŸ˜‰

(Pre) FTRW 2013 – On Offensive Words

Freedom to Read Week starts next week but since a couple of my colleaguesĀ my colleagues were on CTV Morning Live today promoting RPL’s various offerings (including a great event you should take in tomorrow night if you’re anywhere near Regina), I thought I’d start things off a bit early too with a very relevant quote from my new favourite comedian, Doug Stanhope:

If you’re offended by any word, in any language, it’s probably because your parents were unfit to raise a child. Ā Because words are just puffs of air. Ā That’s all they are. Ā And if you’re afraid of a puff of air, you’re an idiot. And so are your parents for letting you think they’re scary. Ā Because words only scare us if we give them power. Ā Take away the power, just puffs of air. Ā Remember that.

“Weir With Meili” #skndpldr

More thoughts to come I’m sure…

But for now, just a shot of two happy, positive, unified politicians.

Great to see!

20130220-193749.jpg

A Tale of Two #skndpldr MLA’s

I’m not going to editorialize too much in this post. Ā But I will say that I found it very revealing to see how the two MLA’s in the #skndpldr race framed their responses to the announcement of a joint Meili-Weir press conference tomorrow morning.

Although many (including myself on occasion) have equated Trent and Cam as being very similar (and in many ways, they are), I think their responses reveal two *very* different leadership styles.

No matter what Erin Weir & Ryan Meili announce tomorrowĀ (my money’s on Weir removing a mask to show he’s secretly Murray Mandryk!)Ā perhaps the most lasting impact will be the insight into what kind of leadership style the two MLAs (who won’t even be at the press conference) Ā would bring if they were to be chosen as Leader.

@ryanMeili Monday – What Role, If Any, Does Family Play in the #skndpldr Race?

I hope everyone had a Happy Family Day (as brought to you by the Sask NDP in 2007…although to be fair, the original and longest-standing Family Day in Canada was brought in by those pro-family, and apparently anti-business, Conservatives in Alberta.)

So what other topic is there to discuss today except what impact the candidates’ families may have in this Leadership Race?

Before I begin, I want to acknowledge that this can be (is?) a sensitive subject. I’m going to be a lot of uniformed speculating and I’ll probably put my foot in my mouth repeatedly. So with that disclaimer out of the way (but not knowing better than to think of some other angle for today’s post), let’s jump right in the deep end…

Okay, so what role has family played in this leadership race?

The ideal answer is that this is about the four individual candidates and their families aren’t (and shouldn’t) be part of the process. But to varying degrees, each has seen involvement from family members, immediate and extended, in many different ways from the beginning of the race (and before – presumably spouses and family had input into candidates’ decisions *to* run) so there is clearly impact.

It goes right to the fact that both Cam, and to a lesser degree, Erin, have evoked the memory of grandparents who were involved in the CCF as a way to add legitimacy to their candidacies by demonstrating their deep family roots in the party.

Moving to the present, one of the most obvious influences was seen during the first month of the leadership race – both Trent and Cam had substantial contributions from people who shared the same surname (although to be fair, there could be other family members who don’t share a candidate’s surname donating to any of the four including Ryan and Erin.)

Another slightly less obvious impact, perhaps only noticeable if you read the candidates’ bios – but which is actually a fairly significant way that the otherwise very similar candidates differ – is the make-up of their immediate families. Cam Broten has two young children, Ryan Meili has one who I think is also younger than both of Cam’s kids, Trent Wotherspoon is married but has no children and Erin Weir is not married. (I almost put “not *yet* married” but that’s more like the kind of assumptive statement my seventy-year old aunt would say! Foot in mouth count = 1!) šŸ˜‰

For some (including my wife) having kids immediately gives Cam and Ryan a bit more legitimacy for some topics such as childcare. It’s one thing for Erin and Trent to understand the idea conceptually, it’s another for Cam and Ryan to have (presumably if Saskatoon is anything like Regina) called around to a bunch of daycares and heard exactly how long they’d have to wait to get in or how far they might have to drive to get a spot in a daycare that has room or, when they go to check it out, realise “This is what I have to settle for?” (I can’t remember his exact words but Cam said something along those lines in the second Regina debate.)

The other impact can be in terms of support you get from your immediate family. For example, my sense is that Cam and Ryan’s wives have both chosen to assist very quietly and behind-the-scenes whereas Trent’s wife has been a constant at his side and a very visible presence for most events. This may be a personal choice for all involved or – foot in mouth moment #2 – it may simply be a reflection of the fact that Cam and Ryan have kids so need their spouses in more of a childcare role while they run whereas Trent’s wife has more freedom to be involved in the campaign since her and Trent don’t have kids. (That isn’t a judgement in any way, just an observation. More on the range of family types we have – and should have – in a sec!)

In terms of Trent’s wife’s impact, it’s not quite Obama telling Hillary Clinton that he sometimes doesn’t know if he’s running against her or her husband, but it does perhaps mean that Trent has someone who is also very active and involved politically to assist with everything from making fundraising calls to glad-handing at events to sharing the driving responsibilities as they travel around the province in a way that Cam and Ryan’s wives can’t do and that Erin, without a spouse, also lacks.

And on an extremely practical level, I have utmost sympathy for Ryan and Cam who are trying to run a very intensive leadership race while also spending quality time with their young kids. Personally, I can’t imagine having to go to a debate or other event having had a sleepless night after staying up with a crying child. Or simply the amount of time that they’re required to be away from their families makes me wonder how anyone can doubt their commitment to the party (especially Ryan who faces this charge more often.)

Okay, that whole section felt like Foot in Mouth so let’s call it #3, 4, and 5. šŸ˜‰

The other role of family comes from the extended family. I’m aware of three candidates having traveled with their parents at different points with Ryan being the only exception (as far as I know). That may be a reflection of the fact that Ryan is (I think) the only candidate who doesn’t reside in the same city as his folks but that’s also paid dividends for Ryan in other ways as he has home bases (and really “homes”) in both Saskatoon and the southern half of the province. (His joke about inviting all the candidates to crash at his parent’s house during the snow-blown Moose Jaw debate was particularly enjoyable. Can you imagine that sleepover?)

There’s another way that extended family can assist – depending on the size of your family and how many places they live across the province (and how well you get along with them I guess!) ;-), members of the extended family can be intentional or even unintentional ambassadors for the candidate. For example (and speaking of family!), I know someone in Indian Head who put Trent as their second choice, simply because Trent has a strong family connection to the town. His aunt and uncle have lived in town for decades, his aunt was a long-time teacher in town and this particular person may have even had a blogger son who graduated high school with one of Trent’s cousins! šŸ˜‰

Even if we don’t want it to, family has had an impact since the start of the race. It began when the three married candidates appeared on stages with their spouses to announce their candidacy and, at least for some people, decisions on who to vote for will be based on who has the “perfect family” or “the photogenic family” or whatever. Once the race is over, this will also be a factor in how the new Leader is perceived by some although, fortunately, we’re not as obsessed with “First Ladies” and other family considerations as the US.

(I said I’d have more on varied family types earlier and I just want to say that, as I sit here rambling about families and relationships and whatnot, and as I appear to be extremely conventional in my own family – married with a wife who’s taken my name, house in the suburbs – although no white picket fence, one boy with a girl on the way (although not 1.5 years apart) but even given all of that, I suspect I’m with – and perhaps beyond – many in the NDP in recognizing and accepting varied family types – two dads, two moms, blended families, had kids before marriage, common-law, etc. etc. etc. Hell, I think that if you’re in a multi-way marriage, as long as everyone’s of age and agreeable, that’s cool too and you shouldn’t have to be a billionaire to justify it.)

Okay, how the hell did I go from talking about the Sask NDP Leadership race to Warren Buffet’s three-way marriage? Wow. Time to push publish before I say something even crazier! šŸ˜‰

Happy Birthday Shea!

Much love from your boys!

Happy Birthday Shea