A Few Thoughts On @BernieSanders Use of Technology #feelthebern #primaryday #newyork

So today was a pretty big day in the United States as born and raised Brooklyn boy, Bernie Sanders went up against adopted hometown gal, Hillary Clinton in the New York primary in their ongoing battle to secure the Democratic Party nomination.

As someone who’s very interested in the use of digital technology and social media in politics, I thought this would be a good time to make a few observations about some of what Bernie Sanders’ cutting edge campaign has done in this area (as far as I can tell from a distance obviously)…

Music Monday – “The riots started slowly/With the homeless and the lowly/It spread into the heartland/Towns that never got a wristband.”

Paul Simon has a new album coming out and it sounds like it could be a good one

Wristband” – Paul Simon

The Importance of Being Skeptical

One of the things I pride myself on is being skeptical.

Although people sometimes confuse terms, skepticism does not mean “cynical” and it doesn’t mean “being an asshole”.

A true cynic distrusts everything new they see or hear, they’re intolerant to new ideas, and they’re pessimistic about everything. They’re not skeptics. That’s a positive trait. They’re the downers of the group whose self-righteousness tends to bring everyone else down, too.

To me, being a skeptic simply means that I try my hardest not to believe things unless I have a *really* good evidence to believe something is true.

Really good reasons do *not* include things like “Well, I read it on the Internet” or “It just feels right” or “It sounds legitimate” or even “I read/saw it on the news so it must be true.

This approach to life has proven useful in a variety of ways from the smallest (being fairly certain that the man with the East Indian accent who is calling from “Microsoft” to say that he thinks my computer – a Mac mind you – isn’t working is likely running a scam) to the biggest (my long-held personal view, reinforced after much thought, reading and consideration that there is likely no god.)

I was reminded of this value again this weekend when the media went wild (and then social media went wild) with a story about how Prime Minister Justin Trudeau put a “snarky” reporter in his place with a “spontaneous” lecture on the meaning of quantum computing during a photo op/funding announcement for a Theoretical Physics Institute in Ontario.

The story immediately set my spider sense to tingling because the whole situation just seemed too perfect – the setting, the snarky reporter and then the PM just happens to have the perfect answer?  (To be fair, Trudeau did study engineering among one of his many majors over the years so it’s possible that cutting-edge computing technology is a personal interest of his?)

Whether Trudeau’s answer was legitimately spontaneous, accurate or something he’d memorized the night before, what I found frustrating was how so many media outlets (and friends on social media who should know better) passed along what appeared to very likely be a planned stunt, specifically designed to go viral while avoiding legitimate concerns and also managing to counter the popular perception that Justin Trudeau is an intellectual lightweight.  (If true, you have to admit Trudeau’s PR people are brilliant!)

Here are some facts that aren’t being noted as much in the gushing media coverage:

  1. Trudeau primed the media covering the event to ask this question by earlier saying “When we get to the media questions later, I have to tell you: I’m really hoping people ask me how quantum computing works!
  2. The reporter who asks the question references Trudeau’s earlier request by saying “I was going to ask you about quantum computing” before trying to ask a lot more timely question about ISIS.
  3. Trudeau’s explanation sounded intelligent (and perhaps it was a good answer for a lay person) but to actual scientists, his explanation was lacking (tellingly, an employee of the institute that just received the funding is the only scientist to give his answer a 9/10.)
  4. No reporter thought to dig a bit deeper (you know, do their job) by following up by asking: “Did you give that explanation spontaneously or did you prepare for it knowing the subject might come up given the location of today’s announcement?”

So again, I’m sure some will say my bias against Liberals/Justin Trudeau also plays into my skepticism here.

And I admit that may be true to a point.

But I hope I’d be equally incredulous if someone who was leader of the federal NDP, just “happened” to start giving a perfect answer about quantum mechanics during a photo op at a quantum mechanics institute.

But maybe I’m just being cynical. 😉

Saturday Snap – Happy Third Birthday, Sasha!

  

Friday Fun Link – Fred Eaglesmith & Spirit of the West Documentaries Coming

Two of my favourite music acts of all-time have upcoming documentaries…

Trailer – The Fred Eaglesmith Traveling Steam Show from Lagoonside Pictures on Vimeo.

Throwback Thursday – #tbt – Pace’s Third Birthday (May 2010)

Sasha’s third birthday is this weekend.

How time flies…it feels like it was only yesterday that we were having Pace’s third birthday party…

3rd Birthday Cake

A Female Leader for SK NDP? Of Course…If They’re The Best Candidate #skpoli

I have no idea if this is a concerted effort but if not, it’s quite a coincidence.

In the last 24 hours on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit and in letters to the editor (including in the comments), a variety of people have been putting forward the idea that the next leader of the Sask NDP should be a woman.

Dave McGrane who’s a political science professor and member of the NDP Executive goes so far as to say “the leadership race should not go forward if there is not a female candidate.”

Yikes!

First off, if anyone had agreed to that rule in 2013 when it was four young white dudes named Broten, Meili, Weir and Wotherspoon running, the NDP might still be waiting to pick a leader!

Second, although I am a fan of diversity, I’m never a fan of tokenism (it’s a subtle distinction but it’s there.)  Perhaps Cam Broten’s greatest legacy is that he brought gender parity to a political party in the legislature for the first time in history. But that wasn’t because the party ran women over men purposely (as far as I know) or gave them extra supports or backing (presumably, unless they were in a ridings that was going to get that extra support no matter what.)  Those women who were elected won their nomination contests then they worked like hell then they won their respective elections, just like every other candidate who won.  (Okay, maybe not some of those Sask Party candidates in rural Sask.) 😉

Third, it’s interesting to hear this groundswell for a female candidate when there could equally be calls for other groups to be represented – First Nations most obviously but others as well – but I’m not hearing that (which is maybe telling in and of itself?)

Anyhow, all rambles aside, I honestly quite like the idea of a female leader and think the right (left?) person could provide a nice counterpoint to Brad Wall.

But my hope is that the NDP *won’t* get too focused on this sort of non-issue and that there’s a strong leadership contest featuring (to be fair, as McGrane also says) a range of candidates who could be young or old; male or female; party insiders or outside activists with the best candidate coming out at the end.

How will the party know that someone is the best candidate?

Hopefully, this time the party will pick the candidate who does the best job in the leadership contest in demonstrating they can do the most important things that a Leader needs to do:

Ten Things The Sask NDP Needs From Its Next Leader 

  1. Showing fundraising prowess
  2. Signing up new members
  3. Inspiring current and new members across all parts of the province
  4. Demonstrated intelligence and mastery of policy
  5. Genuine connection with non-members even if they’re not NDPers
  6. Utilizing innovative practices that will lay the groundwork for the party to finally end the Brad Wall era in Saskatchewan
  7. An inclusive, positive approach that brings the party together after the leadership race
  8. Someone who provides a strong contrast to Brad Wall.
  9. I’m not a fan of MBA-speak but I’d like to see someone who *gets* branding, PR, framing, spin and other modern marketing techniques.
  10. The candidate *must* be bilingual. (oops, I thought I was posting about the next Federal leader for a second!) 😉

One Thing The NDP Does *Not* Need From Its Next Leader

  1. A requirement that the leader have a vagina.

May the best (wo)man win!

 

Ranking Some Potential #skndpldr Candidates #skpoli

So Cam Broten resigned as Leader of the Sask NDP yesterday.

I’m seeing a range of reactions across social media ranging from lots of “Thank-you Cam“-type messages to some that are celebrating his defeat.

Maybe it’s because the Stanley Cup playoffs are about to start (Go Panthers!) but personally, I keep thinking about a sports analogy.

To me, being Party Leader is sort of like being a head coach in hockey.  You’re “hired to be fired”. Even when you get results, you’re just postponing the inevitable.  And if you don’t get results, sometimes you leave unceremoniously – even if you only get one chance and/or even if it’s not fair that one person gets singled out for the faults the players, the managers, the others on the coaching staff, the team’s historical performance or myriad other factors, both within and beyond your control.  (Edit: Ack! I see Noah Evanchuk has already used the “coach” analogy. I didn’t see that before I wrote this – honest!)

(Someone else had another analogy – they said it’s sort of like a funeral where everyone’s saying nice things about the dearly departed but what really needs to be done is to have a frank conversation about why this is the second person to meet the same fate in less than five years!)

So anyhow, I may have some other thoughts about the Sask NDP’s campaign and how they might move forward in the weeks and months to come.  But for now, I think I’ll focus on turning the page with a patented Head Tale list…

Here’s a list of some of the names who might run for the Sask NDP leadership, ranked roughly by their odds of winning the leadership…

Top Tier

Top-Middle Tier

  • Buckley Belanger, Danielle Chartier, Cathy Sproule – existing MLA’s with more than one term in office

Middle Tier

  • Doyle Vermette, Warren McCall, David Forbes – also multi-term MLA’s but whose names don’t come up as much as other current MLA’s in “potential leader” discussions
  • Yens Pedersen – former leadership candidate, former party president
  • Noah Evanchuk – former MP candidate 

Bottom-Middle Tier

Long(er) Shots

  • There are probably numerous others within the party in behind-the-scenes roles (Party President, etc.) or municipal politicians (eg. Charlie Clark in Saskatoon) or academics (eg. David McGrane) or former MLA’s/MP’s or others who are involved in grassroots activism or the labour movement (someone suggested Sask Fed of Labour President, Larry Hubich on Twitter but I think he quickly shot them down.  But maybe Tom Graham who’s President of CUPE Sask?) who might throw their hat in the ring.
  • Maybe some media personality?
  • Possibly a First Nations leader?
  • Some are speculating about a former leader coming back – Lorne Calvert or Roy Romanow – but I think they’re either joking or delusional! 😉
  • [Edit: Along the same lines as a former leader coming back, someone suggested to me that a former MLA who was defeated in 2011 or retired might also consider running – someone like Frank Quennell is tied pretty closely to Cam Broten but others like Pat Atkinson or Sandra Morin or Darcy Furber might consider it.]

Longest Shots

  • Naveed Anwar (sorry, I couldn’t help myself!)
  • Dwain Lingenfelter (suggested by a reader)

As for interim leader, I think it’ll either be Cathy Sproule (if she doesn’t want the leadership) or David Forbes.

Music Monday – “I made something of myself and now you wanna come back/But your love—it isn’t free, it has to be earned/Back then I didn’t have anything you needed so I was worthless”

“American Idol” which has had a massive impact on pop culture ended its 15 season run last week.

So I thought I would post a recent clip from the season one winner, Kelly Clarkson, who gives an amazing performance of a very personal song she wrote that contrasts her absentee father against the father of her current child.

Beyond Clarkson being emotional thinking about where she started and how far she’s come as Idol nears its end, she’s also pregnant as she sings this song which adds even more to the emotional impact if that’s possible.

Watch with the Kleenex handy…

Piece by Piece” – Kelly Clarkson

A Bad Week for the #NDP: Federal NDP Lose Election Then Leader. Sask NDP Lose Election Then Leader? #skpoli #canpoli #yeg2016

So it’s been a pretty tough week for Team Orange…

The Saskatchewan NDP got a shellacking in the provincial election last Monday, a loss which many are blaming at least partly on still lingering divisions between the 50.3% of the party that supported Cam Broten and the 49.7% of the party that supported Ryan Meili in the last NDP leadership race.  This setback for the Sask NDP was capped by the shocking loss of the Leader Cam Broten’s own seat.

Then the Federal NDP had their convention this weekend which many are also portraying as evidence of a party divided – between those who would defend the resource economy and the workers who rely on resource jobs against those who want to LEAP into the future via a quick shift to a green economy.  This convention was capped by the shocking defeat of Leader Tom Mulcair in a leadership review.

This never-ending dichotomy between the pragmatists and idealists reminds me of the post I did after the last Sask NDP Leadership Race summarizing some reading I’d done about how there are two differing approaches to politics – the naive (embodied by idealistic progressives like Naomi Klein) and the cynical (embodied by more pragmatic centrists like Rachel Notley) in a constant push-pull between ideological purity and making concessions to appeal to the broadest swath of citizens so as to gain power and actually have the potential to implement your positions.

Given recent events, that post needs revised though.  Both Cam Broten and Tom Mulcair have shown that there is one faulty assumption in the definition of these two approaches, namely, the conventional wisdom that a strong focus on centrist policies, top-down control, safe over risky in all things, etc. is your best bet for electoral success while “radical” left wing candidates are unelectable.

In fact, with the quick rise of democratic socialist, Jeremy Corbyn who was elected Labour Leader in the UK and leads the official opposition there; the meteoric rise of Bernie Sanders from fringe democratic socialist candidate at the start of his Presidential campaign to challenging and often defeating the best positioned political candidate in history to yes, even Mr. Trudeau, who true to Liberal form, ran as if he were a leftist and ended up being rewarded with a resounding majority for his efforts (yet is back to centrist positions), something different seems to be happening.

People appear to have a hunger for something different – authenticity, honesty, trustworthiness, inspiration – that they’re not getting anywhere else but from the candidates that are normally easily dismissed as being too idealistic.

Given that, it’ll be interesting to see where the Sask NDP and the Federal NDP end up with their respective leadership situations.

(Quick clarification – As I said in my initial post a couple years ago, the lines between “naive” and “cynical” aren’t always 100% in one direction or the other and are more along a spectrum that mixes aspects of both.  Or as a colleague put it, “Why are people shocked to hear that supporters of the NDP can hold and consider the pros and cons of two opposing positions in their head at the same time?”  On that same point, I think it’s safe to say that Mulcair/Broten were both chosen because they were “safe” centrist candidates who were seen as giving their parties their best chances for electoral success.  Yet even those two clashed on certain policies even though they otherwise had many political similarities.  These variances are partly due to the spectrum and partly due to different perceptions in different parts of the country about what is “moderate”, what is “progressive” and so on.)