Friday Fun Link – The Hollywood Librarian: A Documentary (May 11, 2007)

“Ann Seidl’s full-length feature documentary, The Hollywood Librarian: A Look at Librarians on Film, will premiere at the ALA Annual Conference
in Washington, D.C., on June 22. The film shows the realities of
21st-century librarianship, including stereotyping, censorship and
intellectual freedom, and the impact of librarians on society.”


How good does this film look?  Wow.  There are a couple  other clips on YouTube about the movie if you click on the embedded vidoe above then look under “Related” to the right of the video.

(via ALA Direct newsletter)

The Price of A Gallon

Driving into pre-natal class tonight, I realised that we've spent more money commuting to the class in the last few weeks than we did actually registering for the class.  Gasoline is still one of the cheapest liquids available for purchase but yet another recent jump in Regina (to $1.17 a litre I think) means that summer's almost here.  Funny how gas prices always seems to jump in summer…

The Price of a Gallon: 47 liquids compared

A British list of liquid prices

Gizmodo breaks it down to eight essential liquids

We Interrupt This Blog For A Farm Report

We interrupt our regular tech/library/baby-related news for an agricultural report.  Heard on the news tonight that it is the 100th Anniversary of Marquis Wheat, an early-maturing hybrid that is pretty much the entire reason that Saskatchewan is known as the bread basket of Canada.  They're doing a bunch of special celebrations at the Experimental Farm in my hometown of Indian Head including planting one plot using 1907 technology. (Oh, here's something I didn't know – the inventor, Charles Saunders, was from London, Ontario.)

Facebook Embarrassments

I was talking to a friend who refuses to join Facebook.  They said that part of the reason they didn't want to join was how competitive it seemed: “I have 46 friends.”  “I have 87 friends.”  “I have 99 friends.” 

And what's the first line of my Feliciter article about Facebook?  “I have exactly 159 friends online.” 

In my defense, I was trying to illustrate the power of Facebook to link disparate groups – I have friends from high school, undergrad, grad school, professional colleagues.  Plus probably 1/3 (?) of those friends are people I've never met in real life but who friended me because I created a group for people from Saskatchewan (the first on Facebook – yay me!) and blatantly invited anyone who joined the group to friend me. 

This was back when I first joined Facebook a year ago and not a lot of other people I knew were on there so it was more of a way to have something to look at when I logged in. 

Now that I have lots of “real” friends on Facebook, I actually regret having so many “Facebook friends” and sometimes think of blocking them or un-friending them.  But that seems very un-Saskatchewan of me somehow.

Plus I may or may not been un-friended for the first time as well (that I know of.)  Facebook doesn't notify you if someone you add never adds you or if someone who has added you as a friend later removes you. 

But I was paging through one of the many UWO FIMS groups' member lists the other day, I saw someone I thought was already a friend with a “Add To Friends” link beside their photo. 

Hmm, what to do?  Did I just mistakenly think I'd added them?  If they dropped me, do I dare risk the humiliation of re-adding them?  Part of me hopes they did de-friend me so I can send an add request just to see what they do (yes, I know that would be verging dangerously close to that guy who sends 50 Add requests to someone without getting the message, “We were never friends in real life, we'll never be friends on Facebook.”)

The friend I mentioned above related another funny story – two friends had a massive falling out but never dropped each other as Facebook friends.  Then one day, one of them got an invite to a party that the other was having.  “Oh, I guess we're friends again!” the person thought happily and responded that they would attend. 

“You stupid ass,” the reply came back.  “I just invited everybody in my Facebook friends list.  We are *definitely* not friends again.”  Ooops!

Oh, one other embarrassment.  I started a group called “Saskatchewan Mafia” and can't believe that its grown to nearly 1500 members.  I put in a bit of time (but not a lot) changing the group's default photo, adding questions for discussion, etc.  But soon after I started my group, a group dedicated solely to the topic of “bunny hugs” (hoodies to anyone outside Saskatchewan) was started and has grown to nearly 5000 (!) members.  Isn't that crazy?  It would be un-Saskie of me to be competitive (I joined that group too – it's hilarious.  All kind of anecdotes about the reactions former Saskies get when they say “bunny hug”) but unreal that they're lapping me by so much.

So that's my daily Facebook-themed post.  In other news from the real world, I'm going to be a father in less than a month. 

Here's my impression of me during the last eight months:

Here's my impression of Shea during the last eight months:

(The tongue sticking out during month two represents morning sickness.  “What's that Shea?”  Ooof

Facebook's Dark Side (And Some Thoughts Why I Blog)

I'd seen this before but a friend sending it to me last week inspired me to get it up on the blog.  It's a Flash video making some conspiracy theorist claims about Facebook – the people who run it having CIA ties, the abuse of its data-mining abilities and so on.

I'm not sure what to think – it could be true, it could be time for somebody to put their tinfoil hat back on.  But the way I look at it, if there is
a secret cabal controlling the world, they're operating at such a
higher level than my day-to-day reality, that it's as if they don't
exist anyhow (if that makes sense.)



I especially like how they claim these shady links to the Department of
Defense when really, that's who created the Internet and so by this person's
rationale,
everything on the Internet is a military-industrial complex
conspiracy (including this blog.  Watch out!  I'm tracking you!) 

Okay, it's a bit more blatant than that when some of Facebook's top executives have direct DND connections but at the same time, you do ultimately have control about how much (or how little information) you put up on that site.

I have Facebook friends who have their first name, their last initial and not a whole lot more.  That's not the spirit of the place (in my opinion) but again, if you worry about how your information is being used, go ahead and make it a bit harder for the Illuminati to track you if you think it helps.

But other than perhaps listing your political and religious beliefs, I'm not sure if it's something to really worry about.  The Flash video says stuff like:

“With
Facebook, you can see people's favourite books.  Or the Top 10 Movies
in any University community.”  Oooh, look out, the CIA is going to
dicovery that people actually like Tom Cruise and hate JK Rowling!



And of couse, there's the fact that anything will sound ominous with a deadpan delivery and some creepy background music. 


I think there's a deeper issue of how willing (young and/or tech savvy) people are to put up personal details online which is something that came up a lot at the Sask Library Association conference this weekend.

I get called on this by friends all the time.  Obviously, if you're reading this, you know that I'm someone who has decided to be fairly open about my background, my interests, and my personal beliefs online.  I don't know why teenagers do it but it made me wonder, why do I do this?

I think there are a few reasons:
– I believe that society, as a whole, is better when you are open with any and all information rather than secretive.  This can probably backfire and there are times when discretion is required but I think people err on the side of keeping information private and guarded too easily and too often. 

– I believe in a collaborative society and part of that deal is that you have to put your own information out there if you're going to be accessing other people's information – their blogs, their photosets on Flickr, etc.  Peer-to-peer networking, in all its forms, makes for a better world.

– I want my blog and Facebook profile and other outlets to be interesting and there are a couple easy ways to do this:

1) talk a lot about other people (the “this is what I think of Classmate X, this is how I feel about co-worker Y” school of blogging)

2) talk a lot about yourself (also know as the Golden Rule of Writing: “Write What You Know”).

I choose the second option (for the most part) because besides being the subject I know best, the responsibility for what I write, if I say too much, only (hopefully) comes back on me. 

I know there could be people whose opinion of me changes because they know my political or religious views or even because of some off-hand comment I make on this blog about some little thing.  But I think most of the people reading this are educated, critical-thinkers who are able to deal very well with differing viewpoints and worldviews. 

Here's a semi-related anecdote to this whole topic.  I bumped into Michelle D. at SLA and we were standing at the registration desk when a classmate of mine from high school who works in the Sask library community came up.  “What was Jason like in high school?” Michelle asked.  “I was a nerd!” I blurted.  “No, not really, Jason was pretty much the same as he is now – somebody who was always friendly and got along with everybody.” 

It's rare that you get some kind of true insight into other people perceive you so that was kind of nice to hear.  And to bring it full circle, I think that's the final reason I feel comfortable with being so open about myself online.  I hope that I'm secure enough with myself and who I am that I don't mind being open about that via my online presence.

Okay, I gotta go find out what all these strange charges on my VISA are…

Friday Fun Link – Tag Clouds for US Presidential Debates (May 4, 2007)

Oh yeah, and it's Friday so time for the weekly FFL (I almost forgot!)

Tag-clouds for the first debates of the Democratic and Republican primaries. (via MetaFilter)

A Bit of Downtime

We've got a bit of a break before the evening events at SLA so me and a couple of my co-workers came back to our suite to relax. 

It's been a great day – seeing lots of people I know from my former life (SPG has a booth here staffed by a former colleague from the Sask Book Awards as does a publisher called the Canadian Plains Research Centre),  people I know from my current/very recent life (a couple FIMS friends are here) and meeting lots of new people (all kinds of librarians from all kinds of sectors.) 

Went to sessions on The Public Library as Social Hub, The Use of Google in Academic Settings and one on Web 2.0 and the library.  All filled with lots of good information and thought-provoking ideas. 

What else?  I guess that's about it for now.  It's always nice when hotel rooms have complimentary WiFi rather than gouging you for $10/day or whatever like some others do. 

Off to Saskatoon…

…for the Saskatchewan Library Association conference so posts may be few and far between until Saturday evening.  Have a good weekend! 

The Revolution Will Not Be Dugg Down

This is one of the craziest things I've ever seen online. 

Digg,
the community web site where users can upload stories and then
other users vote them up or down with the most popular stories forming
the highly trafficked home page, had a major revolt yesterday.


It
began when an article that contained the encryption key for the DRM
protection scheme of the new HD-DVD technology.  The article was
removed from the site with an explanation from a site official that
they were complying with a cease and desist order and that this post
violated Digg's Terms of Service.  The community was offended by this
(perceived?) censorship and began voting up a number of articles
containing the code (a 16 digit hex value) until
the entire Digg front page consisted of nothing but
stories about and/or containing the encryption code.  (Another wrinkle
that got people angry was that HD-DVD is a sponsor of the popular
Diggnation video podcast.)

Digg
initially reacted by banning the accounts of people posting these links
and removing the stories.  But the response was so overwhelming that
they reversed their position within a day. 


“But now, after seeing
hundreds of stories and reading thousands of comments, you’ve made it
clear. You’d rather see Digg go down fighting than bow down to a bigger
company. We hear you, and effective immediately we won’t delete stories
or comments containing the code and will deal with whatever the
consequences might be.”




(much of this write-up is based on the Wikipedia summary of the incident as well as a few other blog posts and Digg threads)



A lot of the Web
2.0 talk these days is about how the secret of online success is to
allow your users to create your content to make a valuable web site. 
People upload pictures to Flickr, bookmarks to Delicious, information
about themselves to Facebook.  But this incident shows the flip-side of
this equation and how quickly things can turn if you offend your users
for any reason (and how a mob mentality can develop as easily online as
off.) 

People have long memories so it will be interesting to see what happens
to Digg in the weeks and months to come?  Will users come back?  Or has
it been permanently tainted by this breech of its users' trust?

(Oh, did I ever mention that Reddit is my favourite community news site and has been for a long time? )

Eye-Opening!

(Ottawa, April 24, 2007) – The Canadian Library Association (CLA) is
pleased to announce Melissa Poremba as winner of the Canadian Library
Association’s 24th Student Article Contest for “Resources You can Count
on @ Your Library”.




Melissa is a distance education student in
the Library and Information Technician Program at Mohawk College. The
idea for Melissa's entry was based on a paper she wrote in 2006 while
studying for her additional qualification in school librarianship at
the Faculty of Education, University of Western Ontario. Melissa has a
BA in both Arts and Mathematics from the University of Waterloo, and a
B. Ed. from the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at
University of Toronto. She has specialist qualifications to teach
Economics and Mathematics at the Intermediate/Senior divisions in
Ontario schools. Melissa has an interest in numeracy education, and her
submission discusses how library resources can be used for numeracy
education.




The Advisory Committee thought that her entry was
original, engaging, well-written, imaginative, readable and had broad
appeal in addition to being a timely topic. One committee member wrote
that “. . . it should inspire all librarians to rethink the potential
of their collections.”




Melissa will be awarded a cash prize as
well as free registration, accommodation and transportation to the
CLA/APLA/NLLA 2007 National Conference and Tradeshow in St. John’s,
Newfoundland, May 23-26, 2007.




The first runner-up is Jason
Hammond for “You Must Have a Lot of Young Readers in Your Family: The
Experiences of Lone Male Patrons in Children's Libraries”. Jason
graduated in December 2006 from the MLIS program at University of
Western Ontario. The Committee members liked that this entry was
personal and experienced-based as well as being interesting, timely and
original. A number of the committee members mentioned that the topic
was eye-opening. Jason will receive a cash prize courtesy of the Wosk
Family and a choice of CLA publications.




The second runner-up is
Kendra Bender for “Library Services for Newcomers to Canada: Embracing
Cultural Diversity”. Kendra is a student in the MLIS program at the
School of Library and Information Studies at the University of Alberta.
Comments on this entry were that it incorporates both personal
experience and a professional research approach, it was well-written,
timely and focuses on Canada. Kendra will also receive a cash prize
courtesy of the Wosk Family and a choice of CLA publications.




“This
year, there were many excellent and unique entries for the Student
Article Contest which made the judging enjoyable, but also very
difficult”, shared Mary-Lu Brennan, Convenor of the Member
Communications Advisory Committee. As one committee member responded –
“Wow! This was a tough exercise – all were well-written, the topics
were interesting and in some cases quite thought-provoking.”




The
prizes are awarded courtesy of CLA, Micromedia ProQuest, Coutts
Information Services and the Wosk Family Bursary. Entries are judges by
CLA’s
Member Communication Advisory Committee which is comprised of librarians and information professionals.

(via Cabot Y.'s Facebook page)

An early draft of the paper I submitted is on my blog
It was revised a bit for submission to the contest – mostly tightening
it up and re-wording some parts.  But the gist of the thing is still in
the original I uploaded if you're interested.  Also, a very public
thanks to John M, Bruce F and Michael T
as well as a few anonymous male classmates who gave me the great
feedback which helped make my paper into something much better than I
could've written without their help. 

It's funny too that I start the blog post where I uploaded my essay by
talking about Cantilever which was an idea David, Sabina, Linda and I
had to start an open-source student writing journal/repository.  The
idea never came to fruition which is too bad – I often felt like I
learned as much reading my classmates' work as reading the source
articles from the pros! 

Other publishing-type news – just got official word last night that after a lengthy revision process, my essay on Alberta user fees (now bearing the much more academic title:  “Cash Cow: User Fees in Alberta Libraries”) has been accepted for publication by Partnership: The Online  Journal That Has A Really Long Name I Can Never Remember

After I got my first suggested revisions back from them, I did a blog
post suggesting that everybody should go through a peer-review process
like this at least once.   I'd stand by that suggestion.  Professors are often short for time and
although many give good feedback and suggestions, few have the time to
deeply analyse your paper the way the journal's anonymous reviewers
do. 

It's super-easy to submit – pick one of your best/favourite essay and
follow the submissions instructions online.  Make sure you do have some
time to do revisions though  because you likely will be asked to do so
(I went through three major revisions of my paper before it was
accepted.) 

But it's now a completely different and much much better paper than the original version that's also posted on my web site (I'm running out of “favourite” paper to do stuff with – I might have to start writing some more on my own! )

I'll post a link to the paper when it's published on the Partnership
web site so you can compare the original X-titled version with the new
PG-titled version.