Real-Time Google Alphabet

The Real-Time Google Alphabet passes the letters of the alphabet to Google Suggest in real time to create a constantly updated list of the things that the Google algorithm thinks users are searching for. 

A New Name For Library Patrons?

One of the big ways that librarians amuse themselves is debating whether to call the people who come into their buildings “patrons”, “clients” or “customers”.  (I wish I was joking about this.  I'm not.) 

I happen to be firmly in the “patron” camp but do recognize that each term does have reasons why librarians choose to use it (or to not use it.) 

Today, while attending a session called “The San Jose Way” which was put on by the Regina Public Library, this ongoing debate was at the forefront – even if it wasn't even addressed directly!

San Jose Public Library has received great attention across North America for their initiatives, all of which come from an extremely customer-focused model of service for their patrons customers.  I liked a lot of what they had to say, disagreed with other parts but I kept coming back to the idea of the “library customer” that underlined their entire presentation. 

There are a few reasons I don't like this term – I think of a customer as someone involved in a financial relationship.  It's true that many library users are involved in a monetary exchange – both in the big picture as taxpayers or occasionally on the micro-level when they pay fines or  charges.  But overall, a core value most librarians treasure is that our programs and services are free.  So bringing a loaded term like “customer” into the equation is misleading at best, corruptive at worst (er, assuming “corruptive” is a word.)

I kept coming back to an idea that Annette DeFavri made in passing during her presentation at CLA 2006 about Systemic Barriers to Library Use.  She said “we're in people's neighbourhoods.  Why don't we call our patrons 'neighbours'?”

She didn't elaborate but that point stayed with me as a brilliant counter to the arguments of the “customer” people. 

Today, during a conversation with an RPL librarian, I refined the idea a bit more…
– neighbours are people you often borrow things from for free with only the expectation that you will return them in a reasonable time
– I would argue that there is a higher level of trust involved when dealing with your neighbours than with retailers
– information exchange is one of the main roles neighbours play for each other
– we often socialize with/at our neighbours (programming)
– many people have a lifetime relationship with their neighbours
– the relationship isn't always a happy one but we usually resolve our differences fairly knowing we have to share space
– you have to close your curtains if you walk around naked (just checking if you're paying attention)

Those are a few off the top of my head.  Any other ideas why library patrons are more like neighbours than customers?  Anyone out there prefer “customer” or “client” as a term and care to share their reasons why?  Anybody want to start a movement to change the word used in libraries across the country to “neighbour”?

Some Thoughts On My Future Retirement

My mom retired this year after 33 years as a registered nurse – three years in Regina, four years off to have kids then thirty years at the Indian Head Union Hospital.  Shea, Pace and I went to the local health district's annual long service & retirement tea (well, actually “dessert bar” so I wasn't complaining!) and watching all the 25 and 30+ year tenure people walk across the stage made me wonder if there will even be these types of ceremonies in thirty years?

My generation (the X'ers) is well-known to have a generational characteristic that we don't stay in jobs very long.  I've been in the workforce for ten years since convocating with my BA in 1997 and have had four jobs since then.  When you consider that one of those years was spent in Li'l London doing my Masters, that's a pretty short time frame per job. And I don't think I'm terribly out-of-line with many of my contemporaries. 

From the above article:

In general, Generation X employees are
those between the age of 19-34.
Unlike their parents and grandparents, Generation X employees do not plan on
staying with one job or company throughout their career, nor will they sacrifice
their family for their job.


I had a funny image of myself attending some public library function at some point in the future: “Jason Hammond is our longest serving employee having spent the last five years in our collection development department.  Mr. Hammond, here is your silver wristwatch.  Congratulations on your dedication, service and commitment to our library!” 

I recently read (and enjoyed – whereas my younger self woud've punched my current self in the mush for even picking up this book) “Motivating the “What's In It For Me” Workforce: How To Manage Across the Generational Divide and Increase Profits” which, once you got past the business/corporate/profit theme, provided a decent overview of the inter-generational conflicts that can occur in today's workplaces which may contain up to four generations – the Matures, Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y (aka Millenials/Net Generation) with the middle two groups making up the bulk of the current workforce. 

Also from the above article, some insight into how my generation differs from the one that came before it:

Generation X employees tend to be less
motivated by promises of overtime pay and more motivated by personal
satisfaction with their jobs. They want to grow in their jobs and learn new
skills. They will change jobs often as they seek jobs that offers them both
better benefits and more opportunity for professional growth as well as personal
fulfillment.

Generation X employees want, and
expect, their employers to hear what they have to say. They want to understand
the “big picture” for the company and how this influences their employment
and growth. They are creative thinkers, independent, results oriented and bring
with them a healthy dose of skepticism.

So is there a grand unifier?  One characteristic that all generations share?  I'm not sure but I think it's a love of silver wristwatches. 

Hidden Facebook Feature

…aka an “Easter Egg” for anybody not down with the kid's lingo.  It's easy to get your own “Facebook Friends” collage.

1. log into Facebook
2. click on the “Friends” tab at the top of the page
3. click on the first “—” separator after “Online Now”. 

Cool, eh? 

(via Stephen's Lighthouse)

Friday Fun Link – The Daily Show Makes Entire Archives Available Online (Oct 20, 2007)

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart has put up over 13 000 segments going back to 1999.  That's pretty cool…or at least it would be if I could get any of the videos in the archives to load. 

Maybe the site's just being hammered with traffic because it's so new.  But it almost makes you wish some of these media giant properties would skip the proprietary site designs and media players and just put it all up on YouTube instead. 

[Edit: Just saw that there’s also a proposal to make all of the books shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize available for free online as well. Following up the Radiohead announcement,
that now makes the announcement of a major music, TV and book release
for free online within a very short period of time. So, the big
question is – which will be the first big Hollywood movie to follow
this model? We should all avoid buzzwords where ever possible but this
really does feel like a paradigm shift. Oh, and the commentator I
linked to about Radiohead says they won’t make any money but the
goodwill they recieve from fans for the move will pay off in the long
term. But another commentator speculates that
Radiohead have made $10 million already,
more than they made from their last three albums combined. The truth is
probably somewhere between these two extremes but I’d lean towards this
being a very profitable move for the band.)]


(via MetaFilter)

Would You Work At This Library?

Would you work for this library?  I would in a heartbeat. 

(See the end of the post for the Internet company I cribbed this hiring manifesto from.  I've re-worded it so it sounds like a library wrote it.)

Our Library delights people
It is satisfying to work at a company that people love. When you wear Library clothing, strangers regale you with tales of how much they like our service. We're ranked number one in customer satisfaction across the entire public sector, narrowly besting such great services as the fire department and the police department. And we're stretching every day to make our service even better.

Much of our success is from our creative use of Internet technology and community to help people discover books and information they will love. Each person has very unique tastes, and we offer hundreds of thousands of books spanning centuries of publishing, so helping people find books tailored to their particular taste is both a huge opportunity and huge challenge.

Our passion is not completely altruistic. When people love the books they read, they become more passionate about books, and that helps our organization grow. As we grow, we get better at information management, and help people get even more enjoyment from books and information. As a Library employee, you power this virtuous cycle.

We're democratizing information distribution
Producers of small books struggle to create awareness of their books. Many books go undiscovered by people who would have loved them. We're changing that. We promote a small book as widely as a big new release to the particular patrons we think will love that little information.

For example, Shelf Monkey is a mid-sized press publication that few people saw when it was released in 2007. But many Library patrons rated Shelf Monkey highly, so our site promotes it to many people, and it is now one of the top 10 borrowed books of all time at our Library, outperforming such blockbusters as “The Road” by Cormac McCarthy and “The Da Vinci Code” by Dan Brown.

As we grow, the market for small books grows, giving a voice to authors and publishers everywhere.

Values Matter
Lots of organizations have lofty value statements; but sometimes they are not reflective of what the organization actually values. To understand the real values of a company, read how people interact with one another, who gets promoted, and who is let go.

At our Library we value – and reward – the following nine behaviors. The more these sound like you, the more likely you are to thrive at our Library. Each year we conduct a 360 review in which we give each other feedback on performance relative to these nine values. Most people find this refreshingly honest and healthy. We value:

* Judgment

Your judgment calls turn out well (people, technical, business, and creative judgment calls). Your insights are influential and important. You are an expert at what you do and a source that other employees look upon for guidance.

* Productivity

You are very effective in getting work done. What you accomplish amazes people.

* Creativity

You are inventive. You re-conceptualize issues to come up with innovative but practical solutions to hard problems.

* Intelligence

You think broadly and strategically. You make subtle connections others miss. You absorb large amounts of information rapidly. You learn fast. You can change directions rapidly when appropriate.

* Honesty

You are known for your candor. You avoid partial truth and tinted truth. You are non-political and straightforward when you disagree with others. You only say things about people you will say to their face.

* Communication

You are effective communicating both in meetings and one on one. You practice Seek First to Understand, then to be Understood.

* Selflessness
You are perceived to be guided by what you think is best for the Library, rather than best for yourself. You are ego-less when it comes to finding the best ideas and interacting with others.

* Reliability

Colleagues perceive they can depend upon you. You are not prone to flakiness, anger, or impulsiveness.

* Passion

You care deeply about the Library's success and your colleagues know it. Your thirst for excellence is infectious and inspiring.


Rules annoy us
Rules inhibit creativity and entrepreneurship, leading to a lack of innovation. Over time this leads a company to being both less fun and less successful.  Instead of adding rules as we grow, our solution to increased complexity is to increase talent density. Great people make great judgment calls, despite ambiguity.

We believe in freedom and responsibility, not rules.

For example, our vacation policy for salaried employees is “take some” – there is no limit on vacation as long you get your work done. Similarly, our travel expense policy is “travel as you would on your own nickel.” That's it. No soul-sapping policy manuals for us. In our last five years as public institution, growing from a $10m to a $20 million budget, our commitment to freedom and responsibility has only grown.

We have found that by avoiding rules we can better attract the creative mavericks that drive innovation, and our business is all about innovation. We are mitigating the big risk technology companies face (obsolescence), by taking on small risks (running without rules).

Our only absolute rule is integrity, and violations almost always result in termination.

We pay well
We believe that one outstanding employee does more and costs less than two adequate performers. Thus we try to pay at the top of the market, and to have only outstanding employees. Our compensation is guided by market rates and performance, rather than seniority or resume.

We focus on large salaries, rather than on bonuses and perks, to provide employees maximum flexibility. Additionally, we offer investment vehicles including fully-vested stock options granted every month, an employee stock purchase program, and a company-matched RRSP program, to enable employees to make decisions to suit their individual financial objectives.

Consistently outstanding people
We're a high-performance team, not a family.

A strong family is together forever – no matter what. A strong company, on the other hand, is more like a professional sports team, which is built to win. It is the responsibility of management at every level to assemble the team that wins big.

To accomplish this, we seek to fill every position in our company with exceptional performers. In many companies, adequate performance gets a modest raise. At our Library, adequate performance gets a generous severance package.

For us, the cost of having “adequate” in any position is simply too large, when we could have “extraordinary”. Extraordinary performance means excellence in the nine values described above. Plentiful extraordinary talent makes for a high-functioning organization.

The benefit of a high-performance culture is that you work with consistently outstanding colleagues, which is exhilarating. You do your best work, you learn the most, and you achieve the highest professional satisfaction, when you're surrounded by excellence.

We hire people who are great at what they do and we give them the freedom to practice their craft without endless buy-in meetings. The result is that you can get things done quickly and are able to see the impact immediately. Our Library is small enough that you can make a difference, yet big enough to change the way millions of people enjoy books and information.

We love books
Many of us are into books; some of us are just developing the love. Each year, many of us flock to conferences, book fairs, festivals and so on, and employees get an unlimited Library account to gorge themselves on books. Meetings are filled with book references, and laughter breaks out often.

We live at the crossroads of technology and information, and we're passionate about both.

We're creating an amazing future
The Internet is changing everything.

We dream of a world where information content is open, global, and instantly deliverable to any screen from cell-phone to laptop to living-room TV. We dream of a world where
everyone is passionate about books and great storytelling. We dream of a world where unknown authors with a vision get discovered and nurtured, so they go on to write their second book. We dream of a world where the Library is respected as the organization that helped facilitate all this.


Our book borrowing statistics are growing and we are investing heavily in this area. Our Web software, which creates a custom Web site for each patron, is still in its infancy. We are constantly improving our integrated library system which handles thousands of book circulations to and from patrons daily.

In 2007, we added online downloads as a new way for Library patrons to read books. Thousands of books are available to read, instantly, right on the Library Web site. The initial reviews have been quite positive. Every year we'll add more books, and over time we'll make it possible to read these books on more devices.

The age of being able to instantly read books over the Internet is just beginning, and we're starting out strongly. It's going to be a fun next ten years at our Library.

A final point about respect: great companies earn the respect of their customers, suppliers, investors and employees by making and keeping certain promises. We promise our patrons stellar service, our suppliers a valuable partner, our funders sustained, successful growth, and our employees huge impact and opportunity.

We aim to keep these promises.

Confessions of a TOG

John M. has posted some reflections on reaching the halfway point of the MLIS program as a part-time student.  He started in the same term as me which was Jan 2006 but because he's only taking 1-2 classes per term, he isn't scheduled to finish until August 2009.  As someone who did the program in the least time possible (one year), it's interesting to compare and contrast our experiences. 

In the post, he also happens to quote from the “Mature Student” profile in my The Twelve Types of Library School Students where I say “[The Mature student] believes the class is a personal dialogue between them and the professor.”

I hope John doesn't think I was referring to him with this line!  The truth is that this was a reference to something going way back to my own long ago undergrad days.  At the time, a friend and I were joking around and came up with a term for the mature students who were in many of our classes and who exhibited this behaviour – “Token Old/Outspoken Guy/Gal” or “TOG” for short. 

The ironic part?  When I returned to library school ten years after convocating as a undergrad, I have to admit that I became a bit of a TOG myself.  I didn't sit front row centre but I did frequently find myself saying “Well, when I was working with this writer…” or “Actually, in my experience, Acccess Copyright does this…” or “I was planning an event once and <tip> really helped make a difference.”

I thought a lot about it and realise now why this happens (since I'm now such a wisened old man compared to the snot-nosed punk I once was). 

A big part of it is that is really is a reflection of mature students honestly having more real world experience than many of their younger colleagues and wanting to share this knowledge.  Another reason (which John mentioned) is the discomfort factor.  Many mature students are returning to University after a long absence and there is a need to assert that we belong somehow.  Finally, some mature students really are egotists who love to hear the sound of their own voice – even if it probably sounds like an adult in a Charlie Brown cartoon to most people in the class.

[Edit: 2008-01-10 – no one will likely ever see this – if you *do* read this, please post a comment so I know people actually occasionally read old articles on this site – but anyhow, I came across an Onion article titled “Guy In Philosophy Class Needs To Shut The Fuck Up” which I thought would be an appropriate addition here.]

Your Salary

This site is pretty cool.  It gives you a visual depiction of what your salary is on a hourly/weekly/yearly basis and even shows a ticker of how much money you earn as you look at the page (especially fun if you look at it while at work!)

In other work-related news, I wore a cardigan to the office today.  Un-ironically. 

Frank Stronach Changes His Tune on Unions

Whether you believe unions still have a role to play in society or not, this is pretty surprising.  Frank Stronach, the owner of the multi-billion dollar auto parts manufacturing company, Magna International has agreed to a deal with the CAW to allow unionization in his factories.

(Hey, if his daughter can flip-flop, why can't dad? )

“”I did say over the years I disagree with some of the philosophies of
unions,” Mr. Stronach acknowledged at a news conference at Magna
headquarters in Aurora, Ont. Monday. “But at the same time, we all have
to change. Business has to change. Unions have to change. We have one
mandate: To be efficient and to be competitive.””


CAW President, Buzz Hargrove weighed in on the agreement as well:
“This new deal is a chance for Magna and the CAW to show you can deal in
labour management relationships differently, Mr. Hargrove insisted.
“When you don't start out with a fight over whether or not the workers
are entitled to have a union, then you can do a lot of things,” he
said.

Oh, and something else – I have a category/keyword “jobs” for external, non-directly-related-to-me employment type stories and one called “work” for stuff that is directly related to the work I do and have done although, now that I think about it, those are probably backwards.  Also, I probably forget which is which and mix them up on a regular basis anyhow. 

Pace Slept Eight Hours In A Row Last Night

Just wanted to record that milestone for posterity.  His mom and I probably put that up there with first food and walking right about now!  Hopefully tonight will be a repeat.