10 Reasons I Will *Not* Be A Library Director Someday

Today is my second anniversary with RPL (only twenty-eight more years to go – but who’s counting?) so I thought I’d do a list to celebrate.

On my old blog, I detailed the story of how, when asked in an interview where I’d like to end up in my career, I blurted out that I’d like to be a Library Director someday.  (To be fair, at another interview, when asked where I saw myself in five years, I replied “I don’t really make long term plans.”  Seriously, it astounds that I ever got hired anywhere!)

Anyhow, as I relate in that old blog post, I know you’re supposed to be honest in interviews but I also honestly don’t know how much of that answer was my serious goal, how much was me saying what I thought the interviewer wanted to hear and how much was what I came out of library school believing that a Directorship is what students who win Spirit of Librarianship awards and are classroom leaders (he says humbly) should naturally aim for.  (Probably a bit of all three.)

So anyhow, only three and a half years into this library racket and two years into my career at RPL (and how weird is it to think of myself as finally having a career?), I thought it’d be a good time to analyze why I *won’t* become a Director someday, pretentious answers at my early interviews notwithstanding. 😉

First, you may want to review a document that outlines what boards *should* look for in a prospective Director [PDF]

Ten Reasons I *Won’t* Be A Library Director Someday
1. As detailed in that last blog post, I’m an ENFP and I read somewhere that most senior managers (not necessarily in libraries although I suspect it’s probably even more the case in our world) are ISTJ, the exact opposite personality type.

2. By being a Director, your job is often more about being an Administrator and less about being a Librarian (although your training and experience as a librarian should and will infuse everything you do as a Director.  But you miss all the “library” work – you’re not doing collections or public service or reference or whatever.)

3.  I try not to take things too seriously.  Most of the time, I think this is a useful quality.  But at times, especially as a senior manager, that’s probably not quite as valued!

4. Obviously right now, I don’t have nearly the range of experience you need to be a Director.  Maybe in ten or twenty years I will but who’s to say?

5.  Simple math.  At Southeast Regional, there were four professional librarians not counting the Director.  Assuming all equally wanted to be Director (not likely the case), I’d still have a 1 in 4 chance.  Assuming that I were to stay at RPL, there are nearly ten times as many professional librarians which means my odds suddenly become much worse.  Plus a city (even a smaller one) like Regina is a much more desirable location than a small rural community so any Director postings will attract highly qualified candidates from all over the country and beyond making the odds even worse.

6. I’m not sure I’d be willing to make the time commitment that this level requires – basically, you need to be prepared to work long hours and be willing to be called upon 24/7/365 as needed.

7.  I have a blog.  Where I’m very opinionated about not only libraries but politics, religion and all manner of “controversial” topics.  That could provide a lot of ammunition for future board members, scorned colleagues, members of the media or general public or anyone else who might want to undercut my chances of becoming a Director or subvert me if I happened to become a Director.  I also tend to be fairly opinionated in general and not always in the most “keep your head down”, politically sensitive way (I’m working on it though!)

8.  I’m too nice.  This was put to me in a conversation about what being a manager takes and the question was asked, “Well, have you ever fired anyone?” (which is a very strange way to measure the worth of a manager if you ask me but whatever.)  I did end up being in two situations at SRL where firing an employee was the desired result – in one, I wasn’t directly involved as I was on the road doing a special project but feel fairly confident I could’ve pulled the trigger no problem, given the *many* problems I saw building with this particular employee.  Without getting into too many details, in the other situation I refused to release a new employee at her six month probation.  I managed to get her a three-month reprieve although the writing was on the wall and she left the library soon after her six month probation meeting.

9.  I don’t know if this is true elsewhere but frankly, Saskatchewan can be hell on Library Directors.  I can’t remember the exact stat but I think we’ve averaged a new library director in at least one of our ten systems at least every couple years or so for over a decade.  That’s a pretty high attrition rate.

10.  This may sound flippant but I don’t like to wear suits and/or ties.  I will “tie one on” very rarely if the occasion seriously warrants it but as a day-to-day thing, it’s not for me.  And as much as I’d like to be seen as a Steve Jobs-esque leader where the tie isn’t required, I don’t think I’m quite that visionary!

I guess my only caveat to this list is that I don’t see any single one of these things as an insurmountable hurdle that would preclude someone from being a Director – maybe just when all ten are taken in combination! 😉

Twitter: 10 Insights

I’m using Twitter a lot more than I used to but still mostly for the links/information that others post rather than as an active contributor myself (other than the occasional “what I had for lunch”-style tweet or FourSquare update.)  Still, this is an interesting article about some of the main things researchers have discovered about Twitter.

Music Monday – “And the tips in a small town/Are so small/You may as well/Just give them back”

This isn’t a Labour Day song per se but those opening lines about struggling to survive on minimum wage and tips captures the struggle of working people as much as any song you’ll hear by Billy Bragg or Pete Seeger.

Thanks also to the colleague who posted the following article on Facebook – “Tough Times For Unions” along with a mention of his conflicted view on unions – recognizing how so many of their gains have helped everyone’s lives whether unionized or not (8-hour work week, minimum wage, etc.) but wondering about what a modern union is/should look like and the uphill battle unions face in the PR department if nothing else after recent transit strikes and garbage strikes in Ontario.

One idea may come from an off-hand remark I heard during a supervisory workshop I recently attended.  The instructor mentioned that there is a union movement in Canada which works based on Christian social justice principles – the Christian Labour Association of Canada whose web site states its mission thusly: “CLAC is an independent Canadian labour union that applies Christian social principles of justice, respect, and dignity to the workplace community. It provides quality representation and a wide range of benefits and training for its members, and active member advocacy that strives to build healthy work communities based on mutual respect and partnership. CLAC is a certified union representing workers in many sectors across Canada since 1952.”.

Again, if you missed yesterday’s post, my views on religion in general are pretty clear.  But I wonder if there might be something to the idea of applying “Christian” (which could equally be read as “common-sense” or “non-adversarial” or “trust-based”) approach to labour relations?

I may be way off with my limited experience in unionized environments but here’s my take – ultimately, management’s responsibility is 100% to ensure the health/growth/success of the organization with its people as just one tool to achieve these goals.  Ultimately, the union’s responsibility is 100% to ensure the health/growth/success of their members – a fact that often puts each side in diametrical opposition with regards to things like wage increases, benefits and so on.

Call me an idealist (you wouldn’t be the first!) but I often wonder, why does it have to be 100% on either side?  Or maybe 90% once each side makes a few concessions?  If negotiations and the relationship could exist somewhere around 60-40 or even 70-30 wouldn’t both sides be better off?  (I’m sure there’s some game theory out there that would prove this better than my lame-ass explanation about how this is more of a win-win for everybody than the current model.)

Of course, this may be an impossible goal – how do you define 70% and 30% in a management-labour relationship?  And how do you inject that level of trust for both sides when historically, the relationship has likely been less than congenial?

One final thought.  Right now, the interaction between management and unions is like a chess game.  But unfortunately, this means that many staff, both in-scope and out, end up playing the role of pawns in the back and forth between the two sides.  (I recognize that, at least on the union side, everyone has the option of getting involved and having more of a say – although this isn’t always feasible for any number of reasons.)

In so many areas, I keep coming back to the way I see things developing in the Web 2.0 world as a model for older processes – and here again, I wonder if things like collaboration, trust, “open-sourcing”, involvement over expertise – can someone help to improve the world of labour relations as well?
Now pass me that guitar – it’s my turn to play “Kumbaya”! 😉

10 Similarities Between Sport & Religion

The Riders once again beat the Bombers in the annual Labour Day Classic at Taylor Field and, with the game happening on a Sunday, I got to thinking about some of the similarities between team sports and religion

TEN SIMILARITIES BETWEEN SPORT & RELIGION
1. Both sport and religion take place in ornate temples regarded as holy by adherents.

2. Each team’s followers think theirs is the one true way.

3. Violence often results from the clash of differing views.

4. Followers are often born into their beliefs – either because they are indoctrinated into their parents’ beliefs at an early age and/or due to the accident of geography that is their birth.  (As an obvious example, I cheer for the Riders who play in a city less than an hour from where I was born and raised.)

5. Each has a holy book that outlines the rules of the game (although each is open to interpretation – as we definitely saw in today’s game!)

6. Both rely on ritual – both on the field and off.   (Think: Certain songs played at certain times, the 3rd Quarter Stretch, Kiss-Cams and the like.)

7. Each claims to speak to a sort of purity and higher ideals but in reality, has finances and money as an underlying driver and sport and religion are both often wracked by scandal.

8. Certain commentators are regarded as prophets, certain players create miracles.  In fact, to borrow from the article I linked to above, much of the language of sport and religion is very similar – dedication, faith,commitment, worship, sacrifice, etc.

9. On a less snarky note, both are often strongly connected to community and charity.

10.  No matter how much we invest in either, both are ultimately meaningless! 😉

Saturday Snap – Garage Sale Prep

Friday Fun Link – The Perfect Five

Every week (or so), The Perfect Five features five songs – one Hyped, one Covered, one Classic, one Remixed and one Loved.  A great place to discover new music.

Wikipedia: Lost Functionalities (and The Only Two Sites I’d Miss If I Had To Choose)

This article is a really good summary of some of the things that have been lost in Wikipedia over the years ranging from the ability to solve disputes simply to the ability to do text dumps into an article trusting that someone else will come along and wikify it.

On that note, for anybody interested in a good history of the site, I’d recommend “The Wikipedia Revolution: How A Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia“.

I was thinking about this the other day and I think that if I had to choose, the only sites I truly couldn’t live without would be Wikipedia and YouTube.  I’d hate to lose Google but there are other search engines out there.  Facebook is handy as sort of a modern address book/party line but again, I think I could survive without it.  I look at Twitter more than I ever did before but it’s still peripheral to much of my Internet use.  Reddit and MetaFilter would probably be the hardest sites to leave behind but there are lots of other aggregators too (although Digg is having one of their annual revolts rights now).

This Post Doesn’t Exist

On my old blog, whenever I missed posting but felt guilty about it since I try to post on a daily basis, I’d just backdate a post the next day (or whenever I got around to it) and pretend nothing had happened.  Since yesterday was the first time this happened on my new blog, I thought I’d pull back the curtain (as if anybody cares) and admit that’s what’s happening here.

So why did you miss a day, Posty McDailyPosterSon?  Well, I was up at 6am to get ready for some training we were doing at work.  Sat in on the training all day which is always more draining than “regular” work (and usually means a longer than usual day too as it did this day.)

Then Shea had a farewell party for her supervisor so Pace got handed off to me and I was in charge of him for the rest of the evening (at least until she got home around 8pm finding me holding him down in an attempt to get him to sleep!)  I crashed out soon after and my next memory is that beautiful feeling of waking up in the middle of the night and realizing you’ve been asleep for a long time but can still sleep for an equally long time.  Nothing better in this world!

And what’s the big deal with needing to post on a daily basis anyhow?  Let’s just say every librarian has a little bit of Rainman in them and leave it at that! 😉

Library Meeting Rooms: Exempt From Library Values?

If you’ve read my blog for any length of time, it’s probably pretty clear that I’m not a big fan of religion (having an atheist theme for my annual Christmas post is a pretty big clue!)

But as someone who feels just as strongly about the importance of core library values and especially providing access to all types of information that patrons may be interested in, I’ve never understood libraries restricting certain groups from the use of their library meeting rooms.

I mean, okay, some you can understand when the use of that meeting room may put the library in a position of helping to break the law (though I’m not sure I agree with VPL’s decision even if I understand the rationale.  And quite ironically, the assisted suicide meeting ended up being held in…a church!)

But restricting a person or group just because they’d be talking about religion (and even using a book as the basis of that discussion) just seems wrong – no matter what the library policy may be.  It’d also be interesting to look at the library’s collection policy – would they also take a pass on buying a copy of this same book?

Music Monday – “La-la-la, la-la-la-la-la, la-la-la-la-la”

A great Sask-a-zydeco song – Happy Song by Crooked Creek – which is sort of the theme song for one of the best hippie fests around (or at least I think it was when I used to go to this festival every year.  Things are a bit hazy! ;-))

While you’re on that requisite ugly MySpace page, check out “Walk Right In The Door” – another good one for swaying under the stars – with or without a partner!