Some Atheism-Related Political Articles

Penn Jillette with a great monologue/rant about various aspects of religion & politics and where they intersect – from how most “Christians” have united under a single banner in the last 40 years at the expense of early atheists like Mark Twain to the growing influence of non-believers in politics plus Mitt Romney’s magic underwear and all manner of other related topics.

Although not directly about religion, a lot of people are talking about how the Republicans were more likely to believe they were going to win while ignoring all science and reason telling them otherwise.

The other atheism-related article I came across coming out of last week’s election is about the changing demographics of believers/non-believers and the potential implications for future elections.  For example, Millennials (people born after 1980) are now somewhere around 30% non-believers.  That’s a huge number (especially for a study coming out of the States rather than say, Norway) when non-believers have traditionally been identified as somewhere between 10-15% of society depending how you define the term. The article also talks about the potential for harnessing this group which is far larger than any other single religious denomination (although, since atheists and other non-believers are literally synonymous with “free-thinkers” that’s easier said than done!)

And yes, 30% is a crazy high number but it’s easily explained when you think of how prevalent the Internet has become and the power of network effects to open up the world to people, especially young people. Before the Net, you basically were limited to your family, your circle of friends and maybe some books from the library to form your worldview.  Now, the Net has made ALL kinds of information available to anybody anywhere (Sue Gardner who runs Wikipedia and spoke at CLA in Edmonton a couple years back explained it a different way – a kid growing up gay in a small town can now literally have their life *saved* because they can see they’re not alone or “wrong” or whatever in a way they never could before the Internet.)

Anyhew, one final story here which I may have told before.  In my first library job, I was talking about some new technology to my boss and he goes “How old are you?”  I told him and he replies “So you’re a Gen-Xer but you think like a Millennial?”  Yeah, I guess so.

I’d never really thought about it before but if you go in for the “generational cohorts” thing, I probably do have as much in common with the Millennials as I do with my own Gen-Xers – at least in terms of how I view and use technology and how I view and (ab)use religion. 😉

[Edit: A friend shared this one about me where the Prime Minister of Australia answers an interview’s question about her declared atheism. Some day Canada, some day…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr1QPmB5RJY

@ryanMeili Monday – Who Best Represents Change For the Sask NDP? (It Depends On How Much Change You Want) #skndpldr

I recently had a very interesting conversation with a high-level supporter of another Sask NDP candidate.

I made some comment about the NDP being in a great position to renew itself with all of the great young candidates that are running. He replied something along the lines that “only your candidate is talking renewal.”

That took me aback a bit, I have to admit.

After all, the NDP suffered its worst defeat in a generation during the last provincial election. So I think renewal/rebirth is a natural course of action. And that informed my reply when I told him “If a candidate isn’t talking renewal for the party, I’m not ranking them on my ballot – period!”

But in contemplating what he said, I think there’s perhaps a bit of truth in that there’s very clearly a range of how much renewal each candidate will represent for the party should they be chosen as the next leader.

I would rank it as follows, from least renewal to most:

LEAST
Trent Wotherspoon
– as sitting MLAs, both he and Cam Broten have very similar profiles and at some level, are going to represent the least amount of change on that basis alone. But as I’ve noted in previous posts, Trent is also the only leadership candidate who supported Dwain Lingenfelter in the 2009 race. So even if Trent is talking about party renewal this time around, I think his actions speak louder than words and it’s somewhat disingenuous if he’s asking for party renewal in 2012 three short years after he failed to recognize that need in the last leadership race. A related fact (again which I’ve mentioned on this blog before) is that Trent has the support of many party insiders who supported Link last time as well – which also speaks more to status quo than change.

Cam Broten – like Trent, Cam is a sitting MLA and that inherently represents a bias towards the status quo. Further to that, although he didn’t support Dwain Lingenfelter in the 2009 race, by supporting Deb Higgins, another long-time MLA instead of throwing his support behind one of the bright young lights of the party like Yens Pedersen or Ryan Meili who had chosen to put their names forward, he was showing a bias towards maintaining the status quo rather than a desire for real renewal when it was most needed and would’ve arguably put the party three years out of the hole it currently finds itself in.

Erin Weir – Erin represents real renewal for the party in a number of ways – both as somehow who isn’t currently part of the party establishment and also as the youngest candidate in the race as well as someone who hasn’t lived in Saskatchewan for a number of years (although keeping his eye on his home province very closely, I’m sure.) But he also has deep roots in the party which mean he’s not the candidate most representative of change (which in many ways makes him very intriguing as a potential compromise candidate.)

So in terms of who represents the most change, that would be…

Ryan Meili – Without question, Ryan represents the biggest chance the party has to renew itself. He doesn’t have a long history with the party (which I know many long-time members see as a weakness but given a) how politicians, left or right, are regarded in general by society, and b) how the NDP are regarded in the province right now, that’s actually a strength as far as I’m concerned.) Beyond Ryan’s lack of a long history with the Sask NDP, he has a proven track record of reaching out to others to create new coalitions – whether as a driving force behind the inter-disciplinary SWITCH program at the U of S or with the number of new members he brought to the party in 2009 – skills which would serve him well as leader trying to renew and expand a party that’s somewhat damaged goods right now. Again, you may disagree but I think we need that type of broadening of the party in the worst way right now and I think Ryan’s easily the best positioned to accomplish this.

You’re probably reading this and thinking I’m dismissing the other three and holding up Ryan as some perfect choice for the party. In a weird way, I think it may be the opposite.

In my view, Ryan’s the right choice. But he’s got probably the biggest hurdle in front of him to make this case to others who will be voting for leader. Even with the debacle of the last provincial election, studies have repeatedly shown that people are naturally resistant to major change – even when they should know better – and this leadership race could end up being another example of that.

Ultimately, it will all come down to how much the party membership realises they need to change – if they feel the party just needs to tweak itself, Trent Wotherspoon and Cam Broten are well positioned. If they want a bigger shift, it could be Erin Weir. And if people are really willing to look at the possibility of a wholesale, ground-up, massive renewal effort (which is what I think the colleague who I mentioned at the start of this post was implying Ryan represented that the other candidates didn’t), then Ryan’s your guy and Bob’s your uncle!

Brules, Belgium (For Remembrance Day)

I came across this graphic last January but immediately thought how it would be a perfect post for Remembrance Day…

Saturday Snap – Other Than “Being Canadian” and Also “Being Five”, Pace is Totally Voting Obama!

This is the CBC story from the Regina Coronation Park & Democrats Abroad US Election viewing party last Tuesday.  (You can also play “spot the Jason” and “spot the Shea” in the background of a few shots.)

This is probably also a good place to record some recent Pace cuteness/genius moments:

  • related to the election, he was anxious to see who won out of Obama and “O’Romney”.
  • At school, they had to make cards to send to active duty soldiers but they weren’t allowed to put anything “bad”.  So one kid had to re-do his when he drew a “mean” face and someone else had to re-draw his when he drew a gun (I’m sure the soliders could handle that but never mind.)  “So what did you draw?” I asked him. “A poppy, a rainbow and a happy face!” he replied.
  • he was playing an XBox Kinect game today.  It finished and displayed his score on screen.  “Oh, I got 77 points” he said which doesn’t seem too amazing unless you consider we only thought he can count to 20 and that he usually misses a few of the numbers between 10 and 20 to get there!

Friday Fun Link – Analysing the Reading Level of the 21 Most Popular Sub-Reddits

Cool idea but not too many surprises on this list – the science sub-reddit is really high (just shy of grade 9 level) and the one for people who smoke pot is really low (just shy of grade 5 level).  Also nice to see /r/atheism come in as one of the top three most advanced sub-reddits.

Here’s the full list for posterity…

subreddit: grade level
/r/science: 8.84
/r/worldnews: 6.98
/r/atheism: 6.68
/r/funny: 6.5
/r/askreddit: 6.48
/r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu: 6.42
/r/bestof: 6.37
/r/todayilearned: 6.32
/r/technology: 6.17
/r/politics: 6.1
/r/movies: 5.83
/r/videos: 5.78
/r/adviceanimals: 5.58
/r/gaming: 5.4
/r/music: 5.12
/r/aww: 5.06
/r/trees: 4.87
/r/IAMA: 4.75
/r/pics: 4.47
/r/wtf: 4.45

Obama Speaks To A Room Of Volunteers Post-Election

Inspirational…

And this clip from Rachel Maddow is pretty good too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVwXA7sHUlE

Regina Public Library is now on Twitter (And So Are A Lot of Other People)

Regina Public Library has officially launched their official Twitter account at @OfficialRPL.

It’s good to see as it’s been a long time coming. In fact, I’ve advocated for us to get on Twitter many times in my four years at RPL and I know others who were pushing for the addition of that service long before I got there.

At one point, we thought we had the go ahead to create an official RPL Twitter account. Maybe a year and a half ago, I was on a committee working to create an online patron satisfaction survey. Our committee suggested to our Administration contact that it would make sense to launch this online survey at the same time that we launched a new RPL Twitter account – killing two birds with one stone as it were. Unfortunately, after initial support for the idea, we were told that a Twitter account needed more planning before implementation – creation of social media guidelines and so on (prompting one person who heard about our experience to joke “It’s 140 characters. How many guidelines do you need?” )

(Also on the question of how many social media guidelines you need,, I’d add my own reply which is “not many!” For example, Ryan Meili’s “Meme Team” has exactly three guidelines for ALL of its social media activity – 1. Keep it Positive 2. Focus on Ryan and What He’s Doing and 3. Don’t Engage Trolls. Heck, that’s less than 140 characters and could be a tweet on its own! Another colleague was even more succinct – “You need one guideline – ‘Don’t be a dick!'”)

RPL also had a brief experiment with Twitter last summer @rplib which lasted 5 tweets and gained 17 followers before coming to a halt.

Unfortunately, it wasn’t the emergence of any kind of social media guidelines or ending of a trial account that finally prompted the launch of the Official RPL Twitter account.

Instead, the library’s hand appears to have been forced after an unofficial account sprang up @RegPubLibrary which seemed, for all intents and purposes, to be an official RPL Twitter account (I know it fooled me when it first showed up in my saved Twitter search for “Regina Public Library”.) The timing made sense too as the library had recently hired a new Social Media Coordinator.

But after asking our Virtual Services and our Marketing departments (which is where the Social Media Coordinator works out of), it became clear that this was an unauthorized account. The OfficialRPL account was launched last week with little fanfare (apparently not even being linked to from the main RPL web site) and the unauthorized account was shut down, likely after RPL sent a take-down notice to Twitter – although the unofficial account appears to have sprung up again, now clearly identifying itself as a parody account.

To be honest, RPL hasn’t had much luck with social media lately.

The union had a blog during its recent contract negotiations which served as an effective advocacy tool but which was closed down after an agreement was reached. But when that site was shut down, a different site called RPLWatch sprang up but without any official sanction (or screening of submitted comments as was the case in the union’s blog.)

This has allowed people to continue to comment on some of the ongoing issues at the library – although in a much more, ahem, forceful manner. (As someone described the RPLWatch blog, it’s a bit like an accident scene where you can’t look away but you also can’t un-see once you’ve seen it.)

That site has an affiliated @RPLWatch Twitter account (which is how I first discovered it) and looking through that accounts list of followers/following, leads to a handful of other parody accounts, ranging in tone from joking (a parody account done in the voice of the library’s mascot, @LyinRPL) to mean (a parody account of our Deputy Director whose name is Julie called @hoo_leee) to those of outside advocates (@reginapublic).

I’ve often repeated the line that the Internet sees censorship as a blockage and routes around it. I think that’s kind of what’s happening here – after the union’s Check-Us-Out blog got shut down at the end of negotiations, a bunch of other outlets sprang up, hydra-like. In addition to the ones I listed above, I know of one other Twitter account about the inner workings of RPL which pre-dated all the others but which has since been shut down. And there are probably others I haven’t come across.

There are some pretty serious charges in these accounts and although I’m no longer the Organization Development Specialist at RPL, I think if I were, the first thing I’d do is recommend some activities to try to assess *how* the internal culture at RPL got so toxic that accounts of this type spring up in the first place. (I did some quick searches but couldn’t find any similar-type sites or Twitters dedicated to criticizing the administration and inner workings of public libraries in various other Canadian cities.)

At the same time, I have to admit that when I was ODS, it was clear that our organizational culture had some issues and I put forward a few different proposals for ways to confirm and address these issues. But like the pushes for Twitter that never got approved over the years, those never moved forward either.

I can’t help but wonder how the situation may be different today if we’d been more pro-active in looking at ways to assess and then improve our organizational culture, just as the story around Twitter may have been different if RPL had moved faster to get on board with that technology.

Obama Wins Re-Election!

Pundits were split along ideological lines but most statistical analysis predicted it was a near-sure thing.

But I still wasn’t sure myself, not after the paths for a Romney victory faded away, not even after CNN projected an Obama victory.

But I’ve just watched Mitt Romney concede, am awaiting Obama’s acceptance speech and it’s going to be real.  Real good!

Here’s the day in 100 seconds…

@ryanMeili Monday Redux – Punching Above Your Weight as #skndpldr #nyc #manhattan

With Ryan Meili in New York today for the launch of “A Healthy Society” at Bluestockings Bookstore in Manhattan at 7pm (and with him getting some pretty high profile attention via a post by Niki Ashton on Michael Moore’s web site), I thought it might be worth re-posting a link to an earlier blog post about the value of having a Sask NDP leader who has a demonstrated ability to “punch above their weight” on the national and indeed, international scene.

Sappy Sunday – What Are Some Stories About Your Dad You’d Want Your Kids To Know?

From Quora, this story about a son, a dad and a boat killed me…

Read Quote of Jonas M Luster's answer to Family and Families: What are some stories about your dad you would want your kids to know about? on Quora